Difference between revisions of "Invasive breast cancer"
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
The above is not applied clinically. A panel of [[immunostains]] (ER, PR, HER2, EGFR, CK5/6) can reproduce the molecular groupings.<ref name=pmid19704256>{{Cite journal | last1 = Tang | first1 = P. | last2 = Skinner | first2 = KA. | last3 = Hicks | first3 = DG. | title = Molecular classification of breast carcinomas by immunohistochemical analysis: are we ready? | journal = Diagn Mol Pathol | volume = 18 | issue = 3 | pages = 125-32 | month = Sep | year = 2009 | doi = 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31818d107b | PMID = 19704256 }}</ref> | The above is not applied clinically. A panel of [[immunostains]] (ER, PR, HER2, EGFR, CK5/6) can reproduce the molecular groupings.<ref name=pmid19704256>{{Cite journal | last1 = Tang | first1 = P. | last2 = Skinner | first2 = KA. | last3 = Hicks | first3 = DG. | title = Molecular classification of breast carcinomas by immunohistochemical analysis: are we ready? | journal = Diagn Mol Pathol | volume = 18 | issue = 3 | pages = 125-32 | month = Sep | year = 2009 | doi = 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31818d107b | PMID = 19704256 }}</ref> | ||
Basal-like breast cancer | |||
*Overview | |||
**A type of breast cancer that is defined by expression of basal markers (CK14, p63, calponin, SMA) | |||
**Not derived from myoepithelial cells, merely express a phenotype more in keeping with basal cells than ductal cells | |||
**Most triple negative (ER, PgR, Her-2); therefore cannot be treated with the usual therapeutic agents | |||
**There is an association in young women between basal-like breast cancer and BRCA mutation | |||
*Classic Morphological clues: | |||
**Relatively circumscribed | |||
**Geographic necrosis | |||
**Abundant mitoses | |||
*However, this molecular group includes a variety of phenotypes including: | |||
**Medullary carcinomas | |||
**Medullary-like carcinomas - tumors with some, but not all, the histologic features of medullary carcinomas | |||
**Metaplastic carcinomas | |||
**High grade invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type | |||
*Behaviour | |||
**Basal-like breast cancer is a heterogeneous group | |||
**The behaviour of basal-like breast cancer appears to fall into two groups: | |||
***The tumours that do not metastasise have a better prognosis than other grade 3 IDC | |||
***Tumours with early metastasis – greater tendency to metastasise to visceral sites associated with poorer prognosis (such as lung and brain) instead of to nodes and bone | |||
Triple Negative Breast Carcinomas | |||
**Triple-negative and basal-like phenotypes are not synonymous but overlap (60–90% of triple-negative tumours are basal-like) | |||
**The classic phenotype of a triple negative tumor includes high histological grade (particularly high mitotic count), circumscribed edge, central fibrosis, necrosis, prominent lymphocytic infiltrate, syncytial growth and spindle cells. | |||
==Immunostains for typing and diagnosis== | ==Immunostains for typing and diagnosis== |
Revision as of 10:04, 20 March 2015
The article deals with invasive breast cancer and the evaluation of hormone receptor & HER2 status. Non-invasive breast cancer is dealt with in non-invasive breast cancer.
Introduction
Overview of invasive breast cancer subtypes
Common epithelial subtypes
Type and percentage of breast carcinomas:[1]
- Ductal - AKA no special type (NST) - 79%.
- Lobular - 10%.
- Cribriform / tubular - 6%.
- Mucinous (colloid) - 2%.
- Medullary - 2%.
- Papillary - 1%.
- Metaplastic - <1%.
Common stromal types
- Malignant phyllodes tumour.
- Angiosarcoma - post-radiation ~ 10 years.[2]
Good prognosis subtypes
Three good prognosis subtypes:[3]
- Tubular carcinoma.
- Mucinous carcinoma.
- Papillary carcinoma.
Comprehensive list of invasive breast cancer subtypes
Epithelial
Counterparts of in situ lesions:
- Invasive ductal carinoma, not otherwise specified.
- Invasive lobular carcinoma.
- Invasive cribriform carcinoma.
- Invasive papillary carcinoma.
- Invasive micropapillary carcinoma.
Other epithelial tumours:
- Tubular carcinoma.
- Medullary carcinoma.
- Mucinous carinoma.
- Metaplastic carcinoma.
- Neuroendocrine tumour.
- Apocrine carcinoma.
- Lipid-rich carcinoma.
- Secretory carcinoma.
- Oncocytic carcinoma.
- Glycogen-rich clear cell carcinoma.
Epithelial tumours seen in the salivary gland:
Seen in the skin:
Clinically diagnosed:
- Inflammatory carcinoma.
In situ lesions:
Proliferative lesions:
Non-specific:
- Microinvasive carcinoma.
Papillary:
- Papilloma.
- Atypical papilloma.
- Intraductal papillary carcinoma.
Adenomas:
- Ductal adenoma.
- Tubular adenoma.
- Lactating adenoma.
- Apocrine adenoma.
- Pleomorphic adenoma.
Myoepithelial
- Myoepitheliosis.
- Adenomyoepithelial adenosis.
- Adenomyoepithelioma.
- Malignant adenomyoepithelioma.
Mesenchymal tumours
- See: Soft tissue lesions.
Fibroepithelial tumours
- Fibroadenoma.
- Phyllodes tumour.
- Periductal stromal sarcoma, low grade.
- Mammary hamartoma.
Nipple lesions
- Nipple adenoma.
- Syringomatous adenoma.
- Paget disease of the breast.
Other
Familial breast cancer
Breast IHC
Molecular classification of invasive carcinoma
A molecular classification:[4]
Type | Percentage | IHC | Histology | Prognosis/clinical |
---|---|---|---|---|
Luminal A | ~45% | ER+ PR+ HER2- | well-differentiated | good, chemo resistant |
Luminal B | 17% | ER+ PR+ HER2+ | high grade | poor, +/- chemo responsive |
Normal breast-like | ~8% | ER+ PR+ (?) HER2- | well-differentiated | good |
Basal-like | ~20% | ER- PR- HER2- | poorly differentiated | aggressive, may have good chemo response, classic for BRCA1 mutation |
HER2 positive | ~10% | ER- PR- (?) HER2+ | poorly differentiated | poor |
The above is not applied clinically. A panel of immunostains (ER, PR, HER2, EGFR, CK5/6) can reproduce the molecular groupings.[5]
Basal-like breast cancer
- Overview
- A type of breast cancer that is defined by expression of basal markers (CK14, p63, calponin, SMA)
- Not derived from myoepithelial cells, merely express a phenotype more in keeping with basal cells than ductal cells
- Most triple negative (ER, PgR, Her-2); therefore cannot be treated with the usual therapeutic agents
- There is an association in young women between basal-like breast cancer and BRCA mutation
- Classic Morphological clues:
- Relatively circumscribed
- Geographic necrosis
- Abundant mitoses
- However, this molecular group includes a variety of phenotypes including:
- Medullary carcinomas
- Medullary-like carcinomas - tumors with some, but not all, the histologic features of medullary carcinomas
- Metaplastic carcinomas
- High grade invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type
- Behaviour
- Basal-like breast cancer is a heterogeneous group
- The behaviour of basal-like breast cancer appears to fall into two groups:
- The tumours that do not metastasise have a better prognosis than other grade 3 IDC
- Tumours with early metastasis – greater tendency to metastasise to visceral sites associated with poorer prognosis (such as lung and brain) instead of to nodes and bone
Triple Negative Breast Carcinomas
- Triple-negative and basal-like phenotypes are not synonymous but overlap (60–90% of triple-negative tumours are basal-like)
- The classic phenotype of a triple negative tumor includes high histological grade (particularly high mitotic count), circumscribed edge, central fibrosis, necrosis, prominent lymphocytic infiltrate, syncytial growth and spindle cells.
Immunostains for typing and diagnosis
DCIS versus LCIS
Tabular comparison for DCIS versus LCIS:[6][7]
Disease | E-cadherin | Beta-catenin | 34betaE12 | CAM5.2 (CK8) |
---|---|---|---|---|
DCIS | +ve | +ve | -ve | +ve peripheral cytoplasm |
LCIS | -ve | -ve | +ve perinuclear | +ve perinuclear |
Invasive versus non-invasive
Myoepithelial markers - typically lost in invasive carcinoma:[8]
Stain | Location | Notes |
---|---|---|
p63 | nuclear | up to 10% of invasive tumours +ve[9] |
Smooth muscle actin (SMA) | cytoplasmic | stains myofibroblasts & blood vessels |
Calponin | cytoplasmic | stains myofibroblasts & blood vessels |
Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMM-HC) |
cytoplasmic | stains myofibroblasts & blood vessels |
Usual ductal hyperplasia versus ductal carcinoma in situ
Markers for UDH versus DCIS:[9]
Disease | CK5/6 | ER |
---|---|---|
UDH | diffuse +ve | patchy +ve |
DCIS | -ve | diffuse +ve |
Lymphovascular invasion
- D2-40 - marks the lymphatic spaces.[10][11]
- CD31 - marks lymphovascular spaces.
- CD34 - marks lymphovascular spaces, less specific than CD31.
- Immunostaining of any sentinel lymph nodes - to look for isolated tumour cells and small lymph node mets.
- Sunnybrook uses CAM5.2.
- ER (estrogen receptor).
- Positive in most breast cancers; +ve in ~75-80%.[12]
- PR (progesterone receptor).
- Positive in most breast cancers; +ve in ~65-70%.[12]
- HER2/neu (HER2).
Note:
- Male breast cancer is usually hormone receptor positive (~97%), and HER2 positivity is quite rare (~6%).[15]
ER & PR scoring
Nuclear staining:[12]
- Give a percentage, i.e. 0-100%.
- Important cut points: 1% and 10%.
- 0% = negative - not treated.
- <10% = low positivity - treated.
- Important cut points: 1% and 10%.
Notes:
- Normal breast epithelial cells have a patchy staining for ER and PR.
- Evaluated on the invasive component.
HER2 scoring
Immunohistochemical based testing:[16][17]
Score | Staining intensity | Cells stained (%) | Membrane staining | Management | Percentage of cases |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | no staining/barely visible | ≤10% | incomplete | No HER2 blocker | ~60% |
1+ | minimal/barely visible | >10% | incomplete | No HER2 blocker | ~10% |
2+ | weak-to-moderate | >10% | incomplete (circumferential) | Needs SISH or FISH | ~10% † |
2+ | intense | ≤10% | complete | Needs SISH or FISH | ~10% † |
3+ | intense staining | >10% ‡ | complete | HER2 blocker | ~20% |
Note for IHC:
- Normal breast epithelial cells do not stain with HER2.
- Evaluated on the invasive component.
- SISH = silver in situ hybridization.
- FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization.
- † Together approximately 10%.
- ‡ The cut point was 10%, changed to 30% and then changed back to 10%.[16]
ISH based testing:[18]
Result | Ratio criteria | Gene copy number criteria |
---|---|---|
Positive | ≥2.0 HER2/CEP17 | ≥6.0 copies of HER2/cell |
Equivocal | <2.0 HER2/CEP17 (required) | 4.0-6.0 copies of HER2/cell |
Negative | <2.0 HER2/CEP17 | <4.0 copies of HER2/cell |
Note for ISH:
- Can be called positive based on either ratio criteria or gene copy number criteria.
Clinical
- ER & PR status determine whether a patient will get tamoxifen or other estrogen receptor modulators, such as raloxifene (Evista).
- HER2 status determines whether patient will get traztuzumab (Herceptin) or other HER2/neu modulators.
Characteristics of the subtypes
Invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
Invasive lobular carcinoma
- Abbreviated ILC.
- AKA lobular carcinoma.
Medullary breast carcinoma
- AKA medullary carcinoma of the breast.
Tubular carcinoma of the breast
- AKA tubular carcinoma.
Metaplastic breast carcinoma
- AKA metaplastic carcinoma.
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast
- AKA micropapillary carcinoma.
General
- Poor prognosis.
- LVI common.[19]
Microscopic
Features:
- Clear spaces/clefting around (small) nests of tumour - diffuse/through-out the tumour - key feature.
- Described as "small clusters of tumour lying within dilated vascular channel-like spaces".[20]
Note:
- Ductal carcinoma commonly has clefting... but it isn't diffuse.
Images:
- Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (flickr.com/euthman).
- Invasive micropapillary carcinoma - crappy image (breast-cancer.ca).[21]
IHC
- EMA +ve (periphery of nests); described as inside-out pattern.[20]
- E-cadherin +ve (centre of nests). (???)
- p63 +ve/-ve.
Apocrine carcinoma of the breast
Mucinous breast carcinoma
Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast
- AKA breast adenoid cystic carcinoma.
General
- Like tumour of the salivary gland.
- Very rare <0.1% of breast malignancies.[22]
- Good prognosis.[22]
Microscopic
- See: Adenoid cystic carcinoma article.
DDx:
- Cribriform DCIS.
- Collagenous spherulosis.
Images:
Invasive papillary carcinoma of the breast
- AKA intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast, abbreviated IPC.
- AKA encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast, abbreviated EPC.
General
- Very good prognosis[23] - it is similar to DCIS.
- Classical menopausal women.
- ~30% present with bloody discharge.[24]
Microscopic
Features:
- Lesion confined to a duct (intraductal) or cyst (intracystic).
- May have a thick fibrous capsule = encapsulated papillary carcinoma.[24]
- Loss of myoepithelial cells - key feature.
- Neoplastic epithelial cells:
- Nuclear atypia - including: nucleoli, nuclear pleomorphism.
- Abnormal architecture - including cribriform, solid, micropapillary, papillary.
DDx:
IHC
- Loss of myoepithelial markers within the lesion.
Glycogen-rich clear cell carcinoma of the breast
- Abbreviated GRCC.
Secretory carcinoma of the breast
- AKA secretory breast carcinoma, abbreviated SBC.
Grading breast cancer
Most common system: Nottingham (aka Scarff-Bloom-Richardson) which is based on:
- Nuclear grade.
- Small, regular (1.5-2x RBC dia.) = 1.
- Moderated variability = 2.
- Marked variation (>2.5x RBC dia.) = 3.
- Tubule formation.
- Majority of tumour - tubules >75% = 1.
- Moderate - 10% to 75% = 2.
- Minimal <10% = 3.
- Mitotic rate.
- 0-5 mitosis/10 HPF (1.52 mm^2 --or-- 0.0152 mm^2 * 10) = 1.
- 6-10 mitosis/10 HPF (1.52 mm^2) = 2.
- >11 mitosis/10 HPF (1.52 mm^2) = 3.
Mnemonic: TMN = tubule formation, mitotic rate, nuclear grade.
Notes:
- Elston & Ellis devised the system that is used.[25] They also wrote a follow-up article in 2002.[26]
Note about mitosis counting
- One MUST adjust for the size of the field of view.
- Most of the Resident scopes have an eye piece diameter of 22 mm. Therefore, the field diameter at 40 X is approximately 22 mm / 40 X ~= 0.55 mm and the field of view is pi/4*(0.55 mm)^2 = 0.2376 mm^2.
- Thus, on a resident scope (with a FOV of 0.2376 mm^2) one should sample 6 or 7 fields of view (FsOV).
- Calculation: 1.52 mm^2 (sampling area) / 0.2376 mm^2 (area / FOV ) = 6.40 FsOV.
- Thus, on a resident scope (with a FOV of 0.2376 mm^2) one should sample 6 or 7 fields of view (FsOV).
- RANT: Sampling 10 fields, where the field of view (FOV) is 0.152 mm^2, is not the same as sampling ten fields, where the FOV is 0.312 mm^2. It surprises me that Elston & Ellis ignore the fact that "10 HPFs" on different microscopes represent different sample areas and that they do not standardize the sampling area.
Calculating Nottingham score
- Grade I = 3-5 points.
- Grade II = 6-7 points.
- Grade III = 8-9 points.
Notes:
- I've found most tumours are grade II.
- The mitotic score is usually 1/3.
- The nuclear score is rarely 1/3 -- even in the tubular subtype.[27]
Staging breast cancer
Sentinel lymph node sampling in breast cancer
General
- Selective sampling of lymph nodes.
- Used for staging.
- Positive LNs = poorer prognosis.
Notes:
- If there is no palpable disease, there is no mortality benefit from axillary lymph node dissection, i.e. positive axillary lymph nodes can be left in situ without affecting outcome.[28]
- This does not negate the fact that a positive sentinel LN biopsy (vs. negative sentinel LN biopsy) portends a poorer prognosis.
Microscopic
Features:
- Atypical cells.
- Nuclear changes of malignancy:
- Nuclear enlargement + variation in size.
- Variation in shape.
- Hyperchromasia and variation in staining.
- Usually in the subcapsular sinuses.
- Nuclear changes of malignancy:
Pitfalls:
- Naevus cell rests.[29]
IHC
Some hospitals use:
- CAM5.2 (LMWK) - to look for isolated tumour cells and small lymph node metstases.
N stage
Sampling usually selective, i.e. sentinel lymph nodes only.
Indictionas for lymph node sampling
Indications for lymph node sampling:[30]
- Extensive DCIS.
- Biopsy suspicious for invasion or with microinvasion.
- Clinical findings (large palable mass) or radiology findings (irregular features) suggestive of invasion.
- Planned mastectomy.
Definitions
Definitions:[31]
- Isolated tumour cells: <=0.2 mm or <=200 cells -- in a single cross-section. †
- Micrometastasis: <=0.2 cm and ( >0.2 mm or >200 cells ).
- Macrometastasis: >0.2 cm.
Notes:
- † The American Cancer Society web site says "or".[31] The CAP protocol says "and/or" and notes it is all subjective.
- Isolated tumour cells are essentially ignored if the there is at least one macrometastasis.
Details
Lymph nodes:[32]
- pN0: nil.
- pN0(i+): <=0.2 mm and <200 cells.
- pN1: 1-3 axillary LNs or internal mammary LNs.
- pN1mi: <=0.2 cm and ( >0.2 mm or >=200 cells ).
- pN1a.
- pN1b.
- PN1c.
- pN2 4-9 positive LNs; internal mammary LNs or axillary LNs.
- pN3.
T stage
- pT1: <= 20 mm.
- pT1mic <= 1 mm.
- pT1a > 1 mm and <= 5 mm.
- pT1b > 5 mm and <= 10 mm.
- pT1c > 10 mm and <= 20 mm.
- pT2: > 20 mm and <= 50 mm
- pT3: > 50 mm.
- pT4: chest wall or skin involvement.
Notes:
- Values should be rounded to the nearest millimetre.
- Therefore:
- 1.4 mm would be pT1mic.
- 1.5 mm would be pT1a.
- Therefore:
M stage
Distant metastasis:
- cM0(i+) <=0.2 mm focus of tumour cells, without clinical signs and symptoms.
- pM1 focus of tumour cells > 0.2 mm.
Lymphovascular invasion
In the context of breast pathology, the Rosen criteria for LVI are widely excepted, and are as follows:[35][36]
- Must be outside of the tumour proper.
- LVI is usually very close -- typically within 0.1 cm.
- Contour of cells should differ from possible vessel wall.
- DCIS with retraction artifact mimicing LVI has a contour that matches its surrounding fibrous tissue.
- Endothelium (usu. flat) should be visible.
- Lymphatics are found adjacent to blood vessels - vessels should be present in the vicinity.
Memory device LUBE-O:
- LVI has a Unique contour, Blood vessels and Endothelium in the vicinity, and is Outside of the tumour.
Note:
- LVI does not affect the stage.
Other
Paget's disease
General
- Associated with underlying breast carcinoma.[37]
Notes:
- Unrelated to Paget disease of the bone.
Microscopic
Features:[37]
- Cells in the epidermis:
- Epitheliod morphology (round/ovoid).
- Cells nested or single.
- Clear/pale cytoplasm key feature - may also be eosinophilic.
- Large nucleoli.
Images:
IHC & DDx:
- See Paget disease.
Trivia
Tumour size and lymph node metastases
There is a paper[38] that calculates the probability of lymph node mets based on tumour size. The developed formula is:
Where:
- = the probability of the lymph nodes being positive.
- D = the largest dimension of the tumour in millimetres.
- Z = 1.0041.
- = 0.019.
Selected values
Tumour size (mm) | Probability |
5 | 9 % |
10 | 17 % |
15 | 25 % |
20 | 32 % |
25 | 38 % |
30 | 44 % |
35 | 49 % |
40 | 54 % |
45 | 58 % |
50 | 62 % |
Natural history
There is a theory that up to 22% of small (radiographically detected) breast tumours regress, based on an analysis in a large population.[39] The study is supported by NCI's SEER data.[40] Also, it generated many comments.[39]
Missed macrometastases
The effect of missed macrometastases is small; this implies using IHC to look for isolated tumour cells is money that isn't well spent.[41]
See also
References
- ↑ Cotran, Ramzi S.; Kumar, Vinay; Fausto, Nelson; Nelso Fausto; Robbins, Stanley L.; Abbas, Abul K. (2005). Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease (7th ed.). St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier Saunders. pp. 1143. ISBN 0-7216-0187-1.
- ↑ URL: http://www.breastpathology.info/Case_of_the_month/2007/COTM_1007%20discussion.html. Accessed on: 28 November 2010.
- ↑ URL: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1947145-overview. Accessed on: 24 August 2012.
- ↑ Mitchell, Richard; Kumar, Vinay; Fausto, Nelson; Abbas, Abul K.; Aster, Jon (2011). Pocket Companion to Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease (8th ed.). Elsevier Saunders. pp. 547. ISBN 978-1416054542.
- ↑ Tang, P.; Skinner, KA.; Hicks, DG. (Sep 2009). "Molecular classification of breast carcinomas by immunohistochemical analysis: are we ready?". Diagn Mol Pathol 18 (3): 125-32. doi:10.1097/PDM.0b013e31818d107b. PMID 19704256.
- ↑ O'Malley, Frances P.; Pinder, Sarah E. (2006). Breast Pathology: A Volume in Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology series (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone. pp. 275. ISBN 978-0443066801.
- ↑ Yeh IT, Mies C (March 2008). "Application of immunohistochemistry to breast lesions". Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 132 (3): 349-58. PMID 18318578. http://journals.allenpress.com/jrnlserv/?request=get-abstract&issn=0003-9985&volume=132&page=349.
- ↑ Lester, Susan Carole (2010). Manual of Surgical Pathology (3rd ed.). Saunders. pp. 88. ISBN 978-0-323-06516-0.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 O'Malley, Frances P.; Pinder, Sarah E. (2006). Breast Pathology: A Volume in Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology series (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone. pp. 276. ISBN 978-0443066801.
- ↑ Ordóñez NG (March 2006). "Podoplanin: a novel diagnostic immunohistochemical marker". Adv Anat Pathol 13 (2): 83-8. doi:10.1097/01.pap.0000213007.48479.94. PMID 16670463.
- ↑ Kahn HJ, Marks A (September 2002). "A new monoclonal antibody, D2-40, for detection of lymphatic invasion in primary tumors". Lab. Invest. 82 (9): 1255-7. PMID 12218087.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Lester, Susan Carole (2005). Manual of Surgical Pathology (2nd ed.). Saunders. pp. 241-2. ISBN 978-0443066450.
- ↑ Gallardo, A.; Lerma, E.; Escuin, D.; Tibau, A.; Muñoz, J.; Ojeda, B.; Barnadas, A.; Adrover, E. et al. (Apr 2012). "Increased signalling of EGFR and IGF1R, and deregulation of PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway are related with trastuzumab resistance in HER2 breast carcinomas.". Br J Cancer 106 (8): 1367-73. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.85. PMID 22454081.
- ↑ Jensen, JD.; Knoop, A.; Laenkholm, AV.; Grauslund, M.; Jensen, MB.; Santoni-Rugiu, E.; Andersson, M.; Ewertz, M. (Dec 2011). "PIK3CA mutations, PTEN, and pHER2 expression and impact on outcome in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab.". Ann Oncol. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr546. PMID 22172323.
- ↑ Schildhaus, HU.; Schroeder, L.; Merkelbach-Bruse, S.; Binot, E.; Büttner, R.; Kuhn, W.; Rudlowski, C. (Sep 2013). "Therapeutic strategies in male breast cancer: Clinical implications of chromosome 17 gene alterations and molecular subtypes.". Breast. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2013.08.008. PMID 24080492.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Rakha, EA.; Starczynski, J.; Lee, AH.; Ellis, IO. (Apr 2014). "The updated ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing in the management of invasive breast cancer: a critical review of their implications for routine practice.". Histopathology 64 (5): 609-15. doi:10.1111/his.12357. PMID 24382093.
- ↑ URL: http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/committees/cancer/cancer_protocols/breast_biomarker_template.pdf. Accessed on: October 7, 2014.
- ↑ URL: http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/committees/cancer/cancer_protocols/breast_biomarker_template.pdf. Accessed on: October 7, 2014.
- ↑ Yu, JI.; Choi, DH.; Park, W.; Huh, SJ.; Cho, EY.; Lim, YH.; Ahn, JS.; Yang, JH. et al. (Jun 2010). "Differences in prognostic factors and patterns of failure between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: matched case-control study.". Breast 19 (3): 231-7. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2010.01.020. PMID 20304650.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 Yamaguchi, R.; Tanaka, M.; Kondo, K.; Yokoyama, T.; Kaneko, Y.; Yamaguchi, M.; Ogata, Y.; Nakashima, O. et al. (Aug 2010). "Characteristic morphology of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: an immunohistochemical analysis.". Jpn J Clin Oncol 40 (8): 781-7. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyq056. PMID 20444748.
- ↑ URL: http://www.breast-cancer.ca/type/micropapillary-breast-carcinoma.htm. Accessed on: 30 May 2012.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Boujelbene, N.; Khabir, A.; Boujelbene, N.; Jeanneret Sozzi, W.; Mirimanoff, RO.; Khanfir, K. (Dec 2011). "Clinical review - Breast adenoid cystic carcinoma.". Breast. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2011.11.006. PMID 22154460.
- ↑ Rakha, EA.; Gandhi, N.; Climent, F.; van Deurzen, CH.; Haider, SA.; Dunk, L.; Lee, AH.; Macmillan, D. et al. (Aug 2011). "Encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast: an invasive tumor with excellent prognosis.". Am J Surg Pathol 35 (8): 1093-103. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821b3f65. PMID 21753694.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Rodríguez, MC.; Secades, AL.; Angulo, JM. (Nov 2010). "Best cases from the AFIP: intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast.". Radiographics 30 (7): 2021-7. doi:10.1148/rg.307105003. PMID 21057133.
- ↑ Elston CW, Ellis IO (September 2002). "Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. C. W. Elston & I. O. Ellis. Histopathology 1991; 19; 403-410". Histopathology 41 (3A): 151–2, discussion 152–3. PMID 12405945.
- ↑ Elston CW, Ellis IO (November 1991). "Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up". Histopathology 19 (5): 403–10. PMID 1757079.
- ↑ MUA. 20 January 2009.
- ↑ Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. (February 2011). "Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial". JAMA 305 (6): 569–75. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.90. PMID 21304082.
- ↑ URL: http://www.breastpathology.info/Case_of_the_month/2007/COTM_1107%20discussion.html. Accessed on: 28 November 2010.
- ↑ URL: http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/committees/cancer/cancer_protocols/2009/InvasiveBreast_09protocol.pdf. Accessed on: 2 April 2012.
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 URL: http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/DetailedGuide/breast-cancer-staging. Accessed on: 8 July 2010.
- ↑ URL: http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/DetailedGuide/breast-cancer-staging. Accessed on: 8 July 2010.
- ↑ URL: http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/DetailedGuide/breast-cancer-staging. Accessed on: 8 July 2010.
- ↑ URL: http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/type/breast-cancer/treatment/tnm-breast-cancer-staging. Accessed on: 9 July 2010.
- ↑ Rosen, PP. (1983). "Tumor emboli in intramammary lymphatics in breast carcinoma: pathologic criteria for diagnosis and clinical significance.". Pathol Annu 18 Pt 2: 215-32. PMID 6674861.
- ↑ URL: http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/committees/cancer/cancer_protocols/2009/InvasiveBreast_09protocol.pdf. Accessed on: 5 August 2011.
- ↑ 37.0 37.1 URL: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1101235-diagnosis
- ↑ Porembka, MR.; Abraham, RL.; Sefko, JA.; Deshpande, AD.; Jeffe, DB.; Margenthaler, JA. (Oct 2008). "Factors associated with lymph node assessment in ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 1988-2002 seer data.". Ann Surg Oncol 15 (10): 2709-19. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-9947-5. PMID 18483831. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.24592/pdf.
- ↑ 39.0 39.1 Zahl, PH.; Maehlen, J.; Welch, HG. (Nov 2008). "The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.". Arch Intern Med 168 (21): 2311-6. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311. PMID 19029493.
- ↑ Jatoi, I.; Anderson, WF. (May 2009). "Breast cancer overdiagnosis with screening mammography.". Arch Intern Med 169 (10): 999-1000, author reply 1000-1. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.95. PMID 19468099.
- ↑ Weaver, DL.; Ashikaga, T.; Krag, DN.; Skelly, JM.; Anderson, SJ.; Harlow, SP.; Julian, TB.; Mamounas, EP. et al. (Feb 2011). "Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer.". N Engl J Med 364 (5): 412-21. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1008108. PMID 21247310.