Difference between revisions of "Pathology books"
(tweak) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Pathology books''' are numerous. | [[Image:Icono_Normativa.png|thumb|right|150px|A book. (WC/Ex Bibliotheca Gymnasii Altonani)]] | ||
'''Pathology books''' are numerous, and still found at almost every pathology conference. Some are good... many leave much to be desired. This article reviews some of them. | |||
==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease== | ==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
===Cons=== | ===Cons=== | ||
*The abbreviations | *The abbreviations take getting use to/may be annoying. | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
| Line 44: | Line 45: | ||
===Cons=== | ===Cons=== | ||
*The style suggested, for grossing, is wordy. | *The style suggested, for grossing, is wordy. | ||
*Checklists | *Checklists might be better. | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
| Line 71: | Line 72: | ||
==Pathology Recall== | ==Pathology Recall== | ||
===Pros=== | ===Pros=== | ||
*Covers the very basics... one saw in medical school. | *Covers the very basics... one saw in medical school. | ||
| Line 78: | Line 77: | ||
*Really only covers the stuff from medical school. | *Really only covers the stuff from medical school. | ||
*Written by non-pathology residents and reviewed by a staff pathologists. | *Written by non-pathology residents and reviewed by a staff pathologists. | ||
==Anatomic pathology board review== | ==Anatomic pathology board review== | ||
Revision as of 02:15, 29 December 2014
Pathology books are numerous, and still found at almost every pathology conference. Some are good... many leave much to be desired. This article reviews some of them.
Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease
This the standard reference for pathology residents. It covers the bread & butter. Often referred to as Robbins.
Pros
- It is the standard work... everyone refers to it.
- You can't really go wrong if you're quoting Robbins.
Cons
- Very wordy. Not particularly practical --when you're sitting in front of the microscope.
- Very US-centric.
Reference
Cotran, Ramzi S.; Kumar, Vinay; Fausto, Nelson; Nelso Fausto; Robbins, Stanley L.; Abbas, Abul K. (2005). Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease (7th ed.). St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 0-7216-0187-1.
Kumar, Vinay; Abbas, Abul K.; Fausto, Nelson; Aster, Jon (2009). Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease (8th ed.). Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 978-1416031215.
Practice of Surgical Pathology
Pros
- Probably the best book for beginners. It covers basic things many others ignore, but are essential.
Cons
- It lacks a few basic things... though this may be excused as it is an introductory book.
Reference
Weedman Molavi, Diana (2008). The Practice of Surgical Pathology: A Beginner's Guide to the Diagnostic Process (1st ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-0387744858.
Diagnostic Criteria Handbook in Histopathology
A relatively short, point-form book that covers most of pathology.
Pros
- It covers most things.
Cons
- The abbreviations take getting use to/may be annoying.
Reference
Tadrous, Paul.J. Diagnostic Criteria Handbook in Histopathology: A Surgical Pathology Vade Mecum (1st ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0470519035.
Manual of Surgical Pathology (Lester)
Pros
- A great reference for grossing. It covers pretty much everything.
- The first edition had great tables summarizing IHC.
Cons
- The style suggested, for grossing, is wordy.
- Checklists might be better.
Reference
Lester, Susan Carole (2005). Manual of Surgical Pathology (2nd ed.). Saunders. ISBN 978-0443066450.
Washington Manual of Surgical Pathology
Pros
- This is one of my favourite books and not very expensive.
- It is to the point.
Cons
- Nice images (in the book) are missing.
Reference
Humphrey, Peter A; Dehner, Louis P; Pfeifer, John D (2008). The Washington Manual of Surgical Pathology (1st ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-0781765275.
Handbook of Forensic Pathology
The best short reference book about forensic pathology.
Pros
- Point form.
- Short.
References
DiMaio, Vincent J.M.; Dana, Suzanna E. (2006). Handbook of Forensic Pathology (2nd ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 978-0849392870.
Pathology Recall
Pros
- Covers the very basics... one saw in medical school.
Cons
- Really only covers the stuff from medical school.
- Written by non-pathology residents and reviewed by a staff pathologists.
Anatomic pathology board review
- Written for pathology residents studying for the US board exam.
- Consists of multiple choice questions with answers and explanations.
Pros
- Covers pretty much everything.
Cons
- Emphasis on lots of nitty gritty... possibly not so useful for the FRCPC exam.
Reference
Lefkowitch, Jay H. (2006). Anatomic Pathology Board Review (1st ed.). Saunders. ISBN 978-1416025887.
Foundation series
General
Pros
- Nice summary boxes.
- Most pictures are high quality.
Cons
- Few summary tables.
- No overview provided - these books are good if one already has a DDx... not very useful if one is swimming about as a PGY-2.
- Expensive.
Individual books in the series
GI
- Missing a significant number of important entities.
Gyne
- Uses endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) instead of the WHO classification.
References
O'Malley, Frances P.; Pinder, Sarah E. (2006). Breast Pathology: A Volume in Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology series (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 978-0443066801.
Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A.; Montgomery, Elizabeth A. (2005). Gastrointestinal and Liver Pathology: A Volume in the Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 978-0443066573.
Nucci, Marisa R.; Oliva, Esther (2009). Gynecologic Pathology: A Volume in Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 978-0443069208.
Zhou, Ming; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina (2006). Genitourinary Pathology: A Volume in Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 978-0443066771.