Difference between revisions of "Invasive breast cancer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→See also: +'.') |
m (→HER2 scoringLester. 2nd Ed. PP.241-2.: sish, fish) |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| >10% | | >10% | ||
| complete | | complete | ||
| Needs SISH | | Needs SISH or FISH | ||
| ~10% | | ~10% | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
*Normal breast epithelial cells do not stain with HER2. | *Normal breast epithelial cells do not stain with HER2. | ||
*Evaluated on the invasive component. | *Evaluated on the invasive component. | ||
*SISH = silver in situ hybridization. | |||
*FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization. | |||
===Clinical=== | ===Clinical=== | ||
*ER & PR status determine whether a patient will get tamoxifen or other estrogen modulators. | *ER & PR status determine whether a patient will get tamoxifen or other estrogen modulators. |
Revision as of 11:42, 14 May 2010
The article deals with invasive breast cancer and the evaluation of hormone receptor & HER2 status. Non-invasive breast cancer is dealt with in non-invasive breast cancer.
Types of invasive breast cancer
- Ductal also known as no specific type (NST) - 79%, ???includes DCIS???
- Lobular 10%,
- Cribriform (tubular) 6%,
- Mucinous (colloid) 2%,
- Medullary 2%,
- Papillary 1%,
- Metaplastic <1%
Ref.: [1]
Standard IHC work-up
Overview
- Immunostaining of any sentinel lymph nodes - to look for isolated tumour cells and small lymph node mets.
- Sunnybrook uses CAM5.2.
- ER (estrogen receptor).
- Positive in most breast cancers; +ve in ~75-80%.[2]
- PR (progesterone receptor).
- Positive in most breast cancers; +ve in ~65-70%.[3]
- HER2/neu.
- Usually negative; -ve in 70-80%.[4]
- Positivity association with a worse prognosis.
ER & PR scoring[5]
- Give a percentage, i.e. 0-100%.
- Important cut points: 1% and 10%.
- 0% = negative - not treated.
- <10% = low positivity - treated.
- Important cut points: 1% and 10%.
Notes:
- Normal breast epithelial cells have a patchy staining for ER and PR.
- Evaluated on the invasive component.
HER2 scoring[6]
Score | Staining intensity | Cells stained (%) | Membrane staining | Management | Percentage of cases |
0 | nil | <10% | incomplete | No HER2 blocker | ~60% |
1+ | minimum | >10% | incomplete | No HER2 blocker | ~10% |
2+ | weak | >10% | complete | Needs SISH or FISH | ~10% |
3+ | strong | >10% | complete | HER2 blocker | ~20% |
Notes:
- Normal breast epithelial cells do not stain with HER2.
- Evaluated on the invasive component.
- SISH = silver in situ hybridization.
- FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Clinical
- ER & PR status determine whether a patient will get tamoxifen or other estrogen modulators.
- HER2 status determines whether patient will get traztuzumab (Herceptin) or other HER2/neu modulators.
Characteristics of the subtypes
Ductal
AKA "NST" = No Specific Type.
Micro.
- Cohesive cells - forming ducts or in sheets.
- Nuclear pleomorphism.
Clinical
- Typically: ER+, PR+, HER2-.
Lobular
- "Single file" - cell line-up in a row.
- Cell should not be cohesive -- lymphoma should briefly come to mind.
- primary lymphoma of the breast exists... but it is extremely rare.
- Cell should not be cohesive -- lymphoma should briefly come to mind.
- NO gland formation.
- If it forms glands... it is more likely NST.
- May have signet ring morphology.
- NO desmoplastic reaction, i.e. the stroma surrounding the tumour cells should look benign and undisturbed.
Note:
- commonly have low grade nuclear features
Subclassification:
- Classic lobular carcinoma.
- Low nuclear grade - NO significant variation of nucleus size.
- Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma.
- Significant nuclear atypia.
Note: Some pathologist grade lobular carcinoma like other types and avoid the term "pleomorphic lobular carcinoma."[7]
Medullary carcinoma
- Some pathologists don't believe this exists.
Epidemiology:
- Thought to have a better prognosis that no special type (NST).
- Association with BRCA1 mutations.
Histol.
- Lesion has well-circumscribed border.
- Syncytial growth pattern = clumps of cells with poorly defined cell borders.
- Lymphocytic infiltrate.
- High nuclear grade (as per Nottingham grading system).
- No tubule formation.
Tubular
Epidemiology
- Typically excellent prognosis.
- Hormone receptors commonly present.
- Well-formed tubules;
- Myoepithelial cells absent,
- +/- Cribriform spaces,
- Apocrine snouts typical,
- +/- Calcification,
- Angled ducts common: "prows" - important feature (low power),
- Looks benign to the uninitated -- IMPORTANT.
ASIDE: prow = front of a ship
DDx:
Grading breast cancer
Most common system: Nottingham (aka Scarff-Bloom-Richardson) which is based on:
- Nuclear grade.
- Small, regular (1.5-2x RBC dia.) = 1.
- Moderated variability = 2.
- Marked variation (>2.5x RBC dia.) = 3.
- Tubule formation.
- Majority of tumour - tubules >75% = 1.
- Moderate - 10% to 75% = 2.
- Minimal <10% = 3.
- Mitotic rate.
- 0-5 mitosis/10 HPF (1.52 mm^2 --or-- 0.0152 mm^2 * 10) = 1.
- 6-10 mitosis/10 HPF (1.52 mm^2) = 2.
- >11 mitosis/10 HPF (1.52 mm^2) = 3.
Mnemonic: TMN = tubule formation, mitotic rate, nuclear grade.
Notes:
- Elston & Ellis devised the system that is used.[11] They also wrote a follow-up article in 2002.[12]
Note about mitosis counting
- One MUST adjust for the size of the field of view.
- Most of the Resident scopes have an eye piece diameter of 22 mm. Therefore, the field diameter at 40 X is approximately 22 mm / 40 X ~= 0.55 mm and the field of view is pi/4*(0.55 mm)^2 = 0.2376 mm^2.
- As someone that studied engineering, I have the impression many pathologists have difficulty with the concept of sampling when mathematics is involved. Sampling 10 fields, where the field of view (FOV) is 0.152 mm^2, is NOT the same as sampling ten fields, where the FOV is 0.312 mm^2. It surprises me that Elston & Ellis ignore the fact that "10 HPFs" on different microscopes represent different sample areas and that they do not standardize the sampling area.
Calculating Nottingham score
- Grade I = 3-5 points.
- Grade II = 6-7 points.
- Grade III = 8-9 points.
Notes:
- I've found most tumours are grade II.
- The mitotic score is usually 1/3.
- The nuclear score is rarely 1/3 -- even in the tubular subtype.[13]
Breast IHC
- DCIS vs LCIS:[14]
- E-cadherin (+ve DCIS, -ve LCIS)
- antibody 34betaE12 (+ve perinuclear LCIS, -ve DCIS)
- CAM5.2 (peripheral stain = DCIS, perinuclear stain = LCIS)
- CAM5.2 is against CK8
- beta-catenin (-LCIS, +DCIS)
- ADH and DCIS[17]
- E-cadherin.
- Present in most epithelial cells.
- Lost in LCIS & invasive lobular carcinoma.
- SMMHC (smooth muscle cell myosin heavy chain).
- Marks myoepithelial cells.
- E-cadherin.
Paget's disease
General
- Cells in the epithelium, i.e. skin, that look like they don't belong.
- Associated with underlying breast carcinoma.[18]
Note:
- Extra-mammary Paget's disease is not assoc. with malignancy.
Micro
Features:[18]
- Epitheliod morphology (round/ovoid).
- Cells nested or single.
- Clear/pale cytoplasm key feature - may also be eosinophilic.
- Large nucleoli.
DDx
- Benign Toker cell hyperplasia.
- Malignant melanoma.
- Bowen disease.
- Nipple duct adenoma (clinical DDx).
IHC
Panel:[18]
- S-100 -ve, HMB-45 -ve (both typically +ve in melanoma).
- CK7 +ve
- CEA +ve (-ve in Bowen's disease, -ve in Toker cells).
Additional:
- HER2/neu - usually +ve.
- CK5/6 -ve.[19]
- Usu. +ve in squamous cell carcinoma.
Familial breast cancer
BRCA1 vs. BRCA2[20]
- BRCA1
- Younger,
- Ovarian cancer,
- Worse types of breast cancer (e.g. triple negative breast cancer: PR-, ER-, HER2/neu-).
- BRCA2
- Older,
- Like sporatic,
- Male breast cancer;
- BOTH assoc. with increased risk of
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
- CAM5.2 (LMWK) - to look for isolated tumour cells and small lymph node metstases.
See also
References
- ↑ PBoD NEED PAGE No.
- ↑ Lester. 2nd Ed. PP.241-2.
- ↑ Lester. 2nd Ed. PP.241-2.
- ↑ Lester. 2nd Ed. PP.241-2.
- ↑ Lester. 2nd Ed. PP.241-2.
- ↑ Lester. 2nd Ed. PP.241-2.
- ↑ MUA. Jan 22, 2009.
- ↑ PBoD P.1146
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ [2]
- ↑ PMID 12405945
- ↑ PMID 1757079
- ↑ MUA Jan, 20 2009.
- ↑ Yeh IT, Mies C (March 2008). "Application of immunohistochemistry to breast lesions". Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 132 (3): 349-58. PMID 18318578. http://journals.allenpress.com/jrnlserv/?request=get-abstract&issn=0003-9985&volume=132&page=349.
- ↑ Ordóñez NG (March 2006). "Podoplanin: a novel diagnostic immunohistochemical marker". Adv Anat Pathol 13 (2): 83-8. doi:10.1097/01.pap.0000213007.48479.94. PMID 16670463.
- ↑ Kahn HJ, Marks A (September 2002). "A new monoclonal antibody, D2-40, for detection of lymphatic invasion in primary tumors". Lab. Invest. 82 (9): 1255-7. PMID 12218087.
- ↑ Lester P.122.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1101235-diagnosis
- ↑ RS. May 2010.
- ↑ PBoD P.1133