|
|
Line 376: |
Line 376: |
| *[[AKA]] ''suspicious for carcinoma''.<ref>THvdK. 19 June 2010.</ref> | | *[[AKA]] ''suspicious for carcinoma''.<ref>THvdK. 19 June 2010.</ref> |
| **''ASAP'' is preferred as it does not contain the word ''carcinoma'' and, thus, cannot be misread as ''carcinoma'', i.e. positive for malignancy. | | **''ASAP'' is preferred as it does not contain the word ''carcinoma'' and, thus, cannot be misread as ''carcinoma'', i.e. positive for malignancy. |
| | | {{Main|Atypical small acinar proliferation}} |
| ===General===
| |
| *It is a [[waffle diagnosis]], i.e. it is not considered an entity with a distinct pathobiology.<ref name=pmid17378841>{{cite journal |author=Flury SC, Galgano MT, Mills SE, Smolkin ME, Theodorescu D |title=Atypical small acinar proliferation: biopsy artefact or distinct pathological entity |journal=BJU International |volume=99 |issue=4 |pages=780-5 |year=2007 |month=January |pmid= 17378841 |doi= |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118508438/abstract}}</ref>
| |
| **Analogous to ''[[ASCUS]]'' on a pap test.
| |
| *ASAP should be used sparingly.
| |
| **One benchmark is < 3-5% of biopsies.<ref>THvdK. 19 June 2010.</ref>
| |
| *Never diagnosed on excision, i.e. prostatectomy specimen.
| |
| | |
| ====Association with adenocarcinoma====
| |
| *On subsequent [[biopsy]] - chance of finding [[adenocarcinoma]] is approximately 40%; this is higher than if there is [[high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia]] (HGPIN).<ref>{{cite journal |author=Leite KR, Camara-Lopes LH, Cury J, Dall'oglio MF, Sañudo A, Srougi M |title=Prostate cancer detection at rebiopsy after an initial benign diagnosis: results using sextant extended prostate biopsy |journal=Clinics |volume=63 |issue=3 |pages=339–42 |year=2008 |month=June |pmid=18568243 |doi= |url=http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000300009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ====Management====
| |
| *ASAP is considered an indication for re-biopsy;<ref>{{cite journal |author=Bostwick DG, Meiers I |title=Atypical small acinar proliferation in the prostate: clinical significance in 2006 |journal=Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. |volume=130 |issue=7 |pages=952–7 |year=2006 |month=July |pmid=16831049 |doi= |url=http://journals.allenpress.com/jrnlserv/?request=get-abstract&issn=0003-9985&volume=130&page=952}}</ref> in one survey of [[urologist]]s<ref>{{cite journal |author=Rubin MA, Bismar TA, Curtis S, Montie JE |title=Prostate needle biopsy reporting: how are the surgical members of the Society of Urologic Oncology using pathology reports to guide treatment of prostate cancer patients? |journal=Am. J. Surg. Pathol. |volume=28 |issue=7 |pages=946–52 |year=2004 |month=July |pmid=15223967 |doi= |url=}}</ref> 41/42 (~98%) of respondents considered it a sufficient reason to re-biopsy.
| |
| | |
| ===Microscopic===
| |
| Features:
| |
| *Atypical appearing acini.
| |
| *Limited extent, e.g. 2-3 glands.
| |
| | |
| Notes:
| |
| *IHC not contributory.
| |
| *Deeper cuts didn't yield anything - '''important'''.
| |
| | |
| DDx:
| |
| *[[Prostatic adenocarcinoma]].
| |
|
| |
|
| =Prostate cancer= | | =Prostate cancer= |