Difference between revisions of "Esophagus"
(→Columnar dysplasia: more) |
|||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
|Intramucosal adenocarcinoma | |Intramucosal adenocarcinoma | ||
| no maturation | | no maturation | ||
| single cells or back-to-back irregular glands with budding and/or cribriforming and/or gland dilation | | single cells or back-to-back irregular glands with budding and/or cribriforming and/or gland dilation or glands with long axis along muscularis mucosae | ||
| moderate-to-marked nuclear atypia, necrosis | | moderate-to-marked nuclear atypia, necrosis | ||
| - | | - |
Revision as of 18:28, 8 December 2011
Esophagus connects the pharynx to the stomach. It is afflicted by tumours on occasion. For some reason or another, it seems everyone at SMH gets a esophageal biopsy... yet patients at SB don't have esophagi.
Normal
General:
- Stratified squamous non-keratinized epithelium.
Normal (esophageal) squamous epithelium:
- Should "mature" to the surface like good stratified squamous epithelium does.
- No nuclei at luminal surface.
- Cells should become less hyperchromatic as you go toward the lumen.
- Mitoses should be rare and should NOT be above the basal layer.
- Inflammatory cells should be very rare.
Diagnoses
Common
- Normal.
- Metaplasia (Barrett's esophagus).
- Dysplasia.
- Adenocarcinoma.
Less common
- Squamous cell carcinoma.
- Eosinophilic esophagitis.
- Candidiasis.
- CMV esophagitis.
Tabular summary
Simplified overview
Entity | Key feature | Other features | IHC/Special | Clinical | Image |
Normal | squamous epi. matures to surface | no inflammation, no atypia | - | - | [1] |
GERD | inflammation (eosinophils, lymphocytes) | elongated (epithelial) papillae, basal cell hyperplasia | incr. risk of Barrett's | ||
Eosinophilic esophagitis | abundant eosinophils | elongated (epithelial) papillae, basal cell hyperplasia, lymphocytes | unresponsive to PPIs | microscopic, endoscopic | |
Barrett's type change | goblet cells | no dysplasia | Alcian blue +ve | incr. risk of adenocarcinoma | [2] |
Dysplasia, low grade | nuclear crowding at surface | hyperchromasia, mild arch. complexity | incr. risk of carcinoma | ||
Dysplasia, high grade | cribriforming | marked nuc. crowding, hyperchromasia | marked incr. risk of carcinoma |
Columnar dysplasia
Entity | Surface maturation | Architecture | Cytology | Other | Clinical | Image |
Normal | matures | round glands | no nuclear atypia | - | - | Image |
Barrett's eosphagus | matures | round glands, normal gland density | +/-scant nuclear atypia | goblet cells | clinical diagnosis | Image |
Indefinite for columnar dysplasia | moderate-to-minimal maturation | round glands, normal gland density | mild nuclear atypia, nuclear pseudostratification | - | follow-up | Image |
Low-grade columnar dysplasia | minimal-to-scant maturation | round glands, +/-rare budding, increased gland density | mild-to-moderate nuclear atypia, nuclear pseudostratification | - | follow-up | Image |
High-grade columnar dysplasia | no maturation | incr. density of irregular glands with budding and/or cribriforming and/or gland dilation | moderate-to-marked nuclear atypia (usu. plump round nuclei), +/-necrosis | - | EMR, surgery | Image |
Intramucosal adenocarcinoma | no maturation | single cells or back-to-back irregular glands with budding and/or cribriforming and/or gland dilation or glands with long axis along muscularis mucosae | moderate-to-marked nuclear atypia, necrosis | - | EMR, surgery | Image |
Indications
- Pyrosis = heartburn.[1]
Infection
Is a relatively common problem, especially in those that live at the margins (EtOH abusers) and immunosuppressed individuals (HIV/AIDS).
Useful stains
- PAS.
- Gram stain.
Overview
Candidiasis
Gross (endoscopic)
Features:
- White patches.
Microscopic
Features:
- Worm-like micro-organisms.
- Pseudohyphae (single cells).
- Thickness ~ 1/3-1/2 of squamous cell nucleus.
- Should be within (squamous) epithelium.
- On top of epithelium does not count,[2] i.e. it is likely an artifact.
Image: Esophageal candidiasis (WC).
Cytomegalovirus esophagitis
- AKA CMV esophagitis.
Clinical:
- Classically at the base of the ulcer; within endothelial cells.
Herpes esophagitis
General
Etiology:
Microscopic
Features (3 Ms):
- Moulding.
- Multinucleation.
- Margination of chromatin.
Images:
Human papillomavirus esophagitis
General:
Microscopic
Features:
- Koilocytes:
- Perinuclear clearing.
- Nuclear changes.
- Size similar (or larger) to those in the basal layer of the epithelium.
- Nuclear enlargement should be evident on low power, i.e. 25x. [7]
- Central location - nucleus should be smack in the middle of the cell.
Images:
Other
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
General
- Abbreviated GERD and GORD (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease).
Clinical:
- Treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).
Microscopic
Features:
- Basal cell hyperplasia;[3] > 3 cells thick or >15% of epithelial thickness.
- Papillae elongated; papillae reach into the top 1/3 of the epithelial layer.[4]
- Inflammation, esp. eosinophils, lymphocytes with convoluted nuclei ("squiggle cells").
- +/-Spongiosis.
- +/-Apoptotic cells.[5]
Notes:
- Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by similar histomorphologic features -- key difference: more eosinophils.
- "Squiggle cells" may mimic neutrophils.
Images:
Eosinophilic esophagitis
General
- The current thinking is that it is a clinico-pathologic diagnosis.[6]
Clinical:
Treatment:
- Avoid exacerbating antigens.
- Topical corticosteroids, e.g. fluticasone.
Biopsies:
- Should be taken from: upper, mid, lower and submitted in separate containers (eosinophilia present through-out-- to differentiate from GERD).
Associations:
Gross/endoscopic
Image: Trachealization - radiograph (nih.gov).
Microscopic
Features:[9]
- Mucosa with "abundant eosinophils".
- Basal cell hyperplasia.
- Three cells thick or >15% of epithelial thickness.
- Papillae elongated.
- Papillae that reach into the top 1/3 of the epithelial layer - definition for GERD.[4]
Notes "abundant eosinophils":
- Criteria for number of eosinophils/area is highly variable; there is a 23X fold variation in published values and only 11% of studies actually define an area (most studies, embarassing for pathologists that understand this issue, only give the number of eosinophils per "HPF")![13]
- The group that published the article cited above did another one... [14]
- The most commonly reported cut points are 15, 20 and 24 eosinophils/HPF, without defining HPF.[13]
- The Foundation Series book[9] says: "> 20/HPF"; VL sees this definition as garbage, as "HPF" is not defined (see HPFitis).
- There is a consensus paper[15] that makes note of HPFitis... and then goes on to ignore to whole issue by defining EE as 15/HPF. It blows my mind that the people could be so will fully blind and that the idiotic reviewers didn't understand this.
- Most resident microscopes at the Toronto teaching hospitals have 22 mm eye pieces and have for their highest magnification objective a 40X. De facto, this means most people in Toronto are using the Liacouras et al. definition.[16]
Images:
- Eosinophilic esophagitis - very high mag. (WC).
- Eosinophilic esophagitis - high mag. (WC).
- Eosinophilic esophagitis (nih.gov).
- EE versus GERD (archivesofpathology.org).[6]
Erosive esophagitis
DDx
- Infections.
- Crohn's disease.
- Pill esophagitis.
Work-up
Pill esophagitis
Classic causes:
- Alendronate (Fosamax) - for osteoporosis.
- Iron (can be demonstrated with Prussian blue stain).
- Doxycycline.
Preneoplastic
Barrett's esophagus
General
- Diagnosis is clinical.
- Pathologic correlate:
- Metaplastic transformation of stratified squamous epithelium to simple columnar epithelium with goblet cells.
- Pathologic correlate:
- Associated with chronic reflux.
Significance of Barrett's esophagus
- Increased risk of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
- Need on-going surveillance, i.e. long term follow-up/repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Microscopic
Features:
- Columnar epithelium.
- Goblets cells -- key feature.
Images:
Neoplastic
Columnar dysplasia
General
Classification
- Indefinite for dysplasia.
- Low grade dysplasia.
- High grade dysplasia.
Management
Low grade dysplasia.
- Follow-up.
High grade dysplasia.
- Endoscopic mucosal resection.[17]
- Surgical resection.
Microscopic
Features to assess:[18]
- Lack of surface maturation.
- Lack of lighter staining at surface.
- Nuclear crowding at surface.
- Nuclei at the surface not smaller.
- Architecture - esp. at low power.
- Glands not round.
- Low-grade feature: gland budding.
- High-grade features: cribriforming, cystic dilation, necrotic debris.
- Gland density:
- Increased & round - think low-grade dysplasia.
- Increased & irregular - think high-grade dysplasia.
- Glands not round.
- Cytology, esp. at high magnification.
- Nuclear abnormalities in: size, staining, shape.
- Loss of "nuclear polarity" = high-grade feature
- Loss of palisaded appearance, rounding-up of nuclei.
- Inflammation, erosions & ulceration.
- Marked inflammation should prompt consideration of knocking down the diagnosis one step, i.e. low-grade becomes indefinite or high-grade becomes low-grade.
Negatives:
- No desmoplasia.
- Stromal fibrotic reaction to the tumour.
- Desmoplasia is rare in the superficial esophagus.[19]
- Stromal fibrotic reaction to the tumour.
- No single cells.
- No extensive back-to-back glands.
Notes:
- Changes similar to those see in colorectal tubular adenomas; however, what would be low-grade dysplasia in the rectum is high-grade dysplasia in the esophagus.
- Presence of goblet cells is mildly reassuring its not dysplasia.[20]
- Desmoplasia present = invasive adenocarcinoma.[21]
Image:
Cancer
General
- Proximal esophagus: squamous cell carcinoma.
- Distal esophagus: adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett's esophagus.
Risks:
Squamous cell carcinoma
Like squamous cell carcinoma elsewhere.
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
General
- Often a prognosis poor - as diagnosed in a late stage.
- May be difficult to distinguish from adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
Tx
- Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) - may be treated with endoscopic mucosal resection & follow-up.[17]
- Surgery - esophagectomy.
Esophagus vs. stomach
The convention is it's esophageal if both of the following are true:[23]
- Epicenter of tumour is in the esophagus.
- Barrett's mucosa is present.
Microscopic
Features:
- Adenocarcinoma:
- Cell clusters that form glands.
- Nuclear atypia of malignancy:
- Size variation.
- Shape variation.
- Staining variation.
- Mitoses common.
Images:
Grading
Graded like other adenocarcinoma:[23]
- >95 % of tumour in glandular arrangement = well-differentiated.
- 95-50% of tumour in glandular arrangement= moderately-differentiated.
- <50% of tumour in glandular arrangment = poorly-differentiated.
IHC
Adenocarcinoma:
- CK7 +ve, CK20 +ve.
Weird stuff
- Inflammatory polyp - assoc. trauma/previous intervention.
- Giant fibrovascular polyp - loose connective tissue covered with squamous epithelium.
- Granular cell tumour.
- Squamous papilloma - koilocytes.
- Heterotopic gastric mucosa ("inlet patch") - benign appearing gastric mucosa.
Granular cell tumour
Microscopic
Features:
- Abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm key feature.
- Granules:
- Size: 1-3 micrometers.
- Poorly demarcated.
- Granules:
- Usu. bland (cytologically non-malignant) nuclei.
Images:
Esophagitis dissecans superficials
General
- Rare & benign condition that resolves without last pathology.[24]
- Case report - chronic with strictures.[25]
- Sloughing of large fragments of the esophageal mucosa - seen on endoscopy.
Microscopic
Features:[24]
- Flaking of superficial squamous epithelium.
- Focal bullous separation of the layers.
- Parakeratosis.
- Variable acute or chronic inflammation.
See also
References
- ↑ URL: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pyrosis. Accessed on: 21 June 2010.
- ↑ ALS. 4 October 2010.
- ↑ Steiner, SJ.; Kernek, KM.; Fitzgerald, JF. (May 2006). "Severity of basal cell hyperplasia differs in reflux versus eosinophilic esophagitis.". J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 42 (5): 506-9. doi:10.1097/01.mpg.0000221906.06899.1b. PMID 16707971.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Cotran, Ramzi S.; Kumar, Vinay; Fausto, Nelson; Nelso Fausto; Robbins, Stanley L.; Abbas, Abul K. (2005). Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease (7th ed.). St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier Saunders. pp. 804. ISBN 0-7216-0187-1.
- ↑ Wetscher GJ, Schwelberger H, Unger A, et al. (December 1998). "Reflux-induced apoptosis of the esophageal mucosa is inhibited in Barrett's epithelium". Am. J. Surg. 176 (6): 569–73. PMID 9926792.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Genevay, M.; Rubbia-Brandt, L.; Rougemont, AL. (Jun 2010). "Do eosinophil numbers differentiate eosinophilic esophagitis from gastroesophageal reflux disease?". Arch Pathol Lab Med 134 (6): 815-25. doi:10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.815. PMID 20524860. http://www.archivesofpathology.org/doi/full/10.1043/1543-2165-134.6.815.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Rothenberg, ME. (Oct 2009). "Biology and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.". Gastroenterology 137 (4): 1238-49. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.007. PMID 19596009.
- ↑ URL: http://www.medicinenet.com/eosinophilic_esophagitis/page2.htm#tocc. Accessed on: 1 December 2009.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A.; Montgomery, Elizabeth A. (2005). Gastrointestinal and Liver Pathology: A Volume in the Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series (1st ed.). Churchill Livingstone. pp. 19. ISBN 978-0443066573.
- ↑ Leslie C, Mews C, Charles A, Ravikumara M (April 2010). "Celiac disease and eosinophilic esophagitis: a true association". J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 50 (4): 397–9. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181a70af4. PMID 19841598.
- ↑ Al-Hussaini, AA.; Semaan, T.; El Hag, IA.. "Esophageal trachealization: a feature of eosinophilic esophagitis.". Saudi J Gastroenterol 15 (3): 193-5. doi:10.4103/1319-3767.54747. PMID 19636182.
- ↑ URL: http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/reprint/164/4/900.pdf. Accessed on: 4 October 2010.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ (October 2007). "Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review". Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102 (10): 2300–13. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x. PMID 17617209.
- ↑ PMID 19830560.
- ↑ Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, et al. (October 2007). "Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment". Gastroenterology 133 (4): 1342–63. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.017. PMID 17919504.
- ↑ Liacouras CA, Spergel JM, Ruchelli E, et al. (December 2005). "Eosinophilic esophagitis: a 10-year experience in 381 children". Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3 (12): 1198–206. PMID 16361045.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Sampliner RE (March 2009). "Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus". Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.03.011. PMID 19306943.
- ↑ Template:Ref GI
- ↑ Template:Ref GI
- ↑ GAG. January 2009.
- ↑ Template:Ref GI
- ↑ URL: http://www.hopkins-gi.org/GDL_Disease.aspx?CurrentUDV=31&GDL_Disease_ID=46159D68-6ED3-4F76-895B-99D8BBBB46EF&GDL_DC_ID=E25BDF77-223D-4B6F-9700-5BE41DBDE28B. Accessed on: 7 August 2011.
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Humphrey, Peter A; Dehner, Louis P; Pfeifer, John D (2008). The Washington Manual of Surgical Pathology (1st ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 168. ISBN 978-0781765275.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 Carmack, SW.; Vemulapalli, R.; Spechler, SJ.; Genta, RM. (Dec 2009). "Esophagitis dissecans superficialis ("sloughing esophagitis"): a clinicopathologic study of 12 cases.". Am J Surg Pathol 33 (12): 1789-94. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b7ce21. PMID 19809273.
- ↑ Coppola, D.; Lu, L.; Boyce, HW. (Oct 2000). "Chronic esophagitis dissecans presenting with esophageal strictures: a case report.". Hum Pathol 31 (10): 1313-7. doi:10.1053/hupa.2000.18470. PMID 11070124.