Difference between revisions of "Prostate gland"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
292 bytes added ,  17:10, 20 June 2010
m
m (ref TPoSP)
Line 142: Line 142:
===General===
===General===
*Abbreviated ''ASAP''.
*Abbreviated ''ASAP''.
*Can be considered to be a ''waffle'' diagnosis... like ''ASCUS'' is on the pap test.
*It is a ''waffle'' diagnosis.
*Should be used sparingly.
**Same as ''suspicious for carcinoma''.<ref>THvdK. 19 June 2010.</ref>
***''ASAP'' is preferred by some as it does not contain the word ''carcinoma'' and, thus, cannot be misread as ''carcinoma'', i.e. positive for malignancy.
**Analogous to ''ASCUS'' is on a pap test.
**ASAP should be used sparingly.
***One benchmark is < 3-5% of biopsies.<ref>THvdK. 19 June 2010.</ref>
*Never diagnosed on excision, i.e. prostatectomy specimen.
*Never diagnosed on excision, i.e. prostatectomy specimen.
*Some experts consider this diagnosis bogus, i.e. some don't believe it exists.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Flury SC, Galgano MT, Mills SE, Smolkin ME, Theodorescu D |title=Atypical small acinar proliferation: biopsy artefact or distinct pathological entity |journal=BJU International |volume=99 |issue=4 |pages=780-5 |year=2007 |month=January |pmid= |doi= |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118508438/abstract}}</ref>
*Some experts consider this diagnosis bogus, i.e. some don't believe it exists.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Flury SC, Galgano MT, Mills SE, Smolkin ME, Theodorescu D |title=Atypical small acinar proliferation: biopsy artefact or distinct pathological entity |journal=BJU International |volume=99 |issue=4 |pages=780-5 |year=2007 |month=January |pmid= |doi= |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118508438/abstract}}</ref>
48,830

edits

Navigation menu