Difference between revisions of "Pathology books"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
211 bytes added ,  16:08, 29 December 2014
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Pathology books''' are numerous. Some are good... many are crap.  This article reviews some of 'em.   
[[Image:Bucheinband.15.Jh.r.Inkunabel.jpg|thumb|right|150px|A book. (WC/Ex Bibliotheca Gymnasii Altonani)]]
'''Pathology books''' are numerous, and still found at almost every pathology conference. Some are good... many leave much to be desired.  This article reviews some of them.   


==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease==
==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease==
This the standard reference for pathology residents.  It covers the bread & butter.
This the standard reference for pathology residents.  It covers the bread & butter.
Often referred to as ''Robbins''.


===Pros===
===Pros===
Line 9: Line 11:


===Cons===
===Cons===
*Very wordy. Not particularly practical --when you're sitting in from of the [[microscope]].
*Very wordy. Not particularly practical --when you're sitting in front of the [[microscope]].
*Very US-centric.   
*Very US-centric.   


===Reference===
===Reference===
{{Ref_PBoD}}{{Ref_PBoD8}}
{{Ref PBoD9}}  
====Previous editions====
{{Ref_PBoD8}}
{{Ref_PBoD}}


==Practice of Surgical Pathology==
==Practice of Surgical Pathology==
Line 29: Line 34:


===Pros===
===Pros===
It covers most things.
*It covers most things.


===Cons===
===Cons===
*The abbreviations are annoying.
*The abbreviations take getting use to/may be annoying.


===Reference===
===Reference===
Line 43: Line 48:
===Cons===
===Cons===
*The style suggested, for grossing, is wordy.   
*The style suggested, for grossing, is wordy.   
*Checklists, [[IMHO]], would be better.
*Checklists might be better.


===Reference===
===Reference===
{{Ref Lester3}}
====Previous edition====
{{Ref Lester}}
{{Ref Lester}}


Line 54: Line 61:


===Cons===
===Cons===
*Nice images are missing.
*Nice images (in the book) are missing.


===Reference===
===Reference===
Line 70: Line 77:


==Pathology Recall==
==Pathology Recall==
*Recommended by J.H.
===Pros===
===Pros===
*Covers the very basics... one saw in medical school.
*Covers the very basics... one saw in medical school.
Line 77: Line 82:
*Really only covers the stuff from medical school.
*Really only covers the stuff from medical school.
*Written by non-pathology residents and reviewed by a staff pathologists.
*Written by non-pathology residents and reviewed by a staff pathologists.
==Pathology Secrets==
*Recommended by J.H.
*M.S. thinks it isn't a good investment.


==Anatomic pathology board review==
==Anatomic pathology board review==
Line 90: Line 91:


===Cons===
===Cons===
*Emphasis on lots of nitty gritty... possibly not so useful for the [[FRCPC]] exam. (???)
*Emphasis on lots of nitty gritty... possibly not so useful for the [[FRCPC]] exam.  


===Reference===
===Reference===
48,830

edits

Navigation menu