Difference between revisions of "Quality"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
27 bytes added ,  19:40, 29 April 2025
Line 137: Line 137:


==Dealing with diagnostic errors==
==Dealing with diagnostic errors==
*Reports that have a diagnostic error should be ''amended''.
*Reports that have a diagnostic error should be ''[[Amendment|amended]]''.
*If an addendum adds information to the report that contradicts other information in the report: it should be an amendment (not an addendum).<ref name=pmid25357114>{{cite journal |authors=Babwah JP, Khalifa M, Rowsell C |title=Analysis of addenda in anatomic pathology as a quality monitoring initiative |journal=Arch Pathol Lab Med |volume=138 |issue=11 |pages=1514–9 |date=November 2014 |pmid=25357114 |doi=10.5858/arpa.2012-0412-OA |url=}}</ref>
*If an addendum would add information to the report that contradicts other information already in the report: it should be an amendment (not an addendum).<ref name=pmid25357114>{{cite journal |authors=Babwah JP, Khalifa M, Rowsell C |title=Analysis of addenda in anatomic pathology as a quality monitoring initiative |journal=Arch Pathol Lab Med |volume=138 |issue=11 |pages=1514–9 |date=November 2014 |pmid=25357114 |doi=10.5858/arpa.2012-0412-OA |url=}}</ref>


It is good practice when amending an report to:
It is good practice when amending an report to:
49,260

edits

Navigation menu