Difference between revisions of "Amyloid in the seminal vesicles"

*A paper by Yang ''et al.'' (looking at a small series) suggests seminal vesicle amyloid is not necessary to work-up further.<ref name=pmid23223033>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Yang | first1 = Z. | last2 = Laird | first2 = A. | last3 = Monaghan | first3 = A. | last4 = Seywright | first4 = M. | last5 = Ahmad | first5 = I. | last6 = Leung | first6 = HY. | title = Incidental seminal vesicle amyloidosis observed in diagnostic prostate biopsies--are routine investigations for systemic amyloidosis warranted? | journal = Asian J Androl | volume = 15 | issue = 1 | pages = 149-51 | month = Jan | year = 2013 | doi = 10.1038/aja.2012.125 | PMID = 23223033 }}</ref>

*Amyloid in the prostate is rare and should be worked-up.<ref name=pmid32961226>{{cite journal |authors=Nevo A, Muchtar E, Stern KL, Moore JP, Cheney SM, Humphreys MR, Grogan M, Stanton ML |title=The Clinical Implication of Incidental Prostatic Amyloidosis |journal=Urology |volume=145 |issue= |pages=253–257 |date=November 2020 |pmid=32961226 |doi=10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.053 |url=}}</ref>