Difference between revisions of "Esophagus"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
544 bytes added ,  15:05, 1 May 2011
Line 204: Line 204:
Image: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841420/figure/F0001/ Trachealization - radiograph (nih.gov)].
Image: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841420/figure/F0001/ Trachealization - radiograph (nih.gov)].


===Microscopy===
===Microscopic===
Features:<ref name=Ref_GLP19>{{Ref GLP|19}}</ref>
Features:<ref name=Ref_GLP19>{{Ref GLP|19}}</ref>
*Mucosa with "abundant eosinophils".
*Mucosa with "abundant eosinophils".
*Basal cell hyperplasia.
*Basal cell hyperplasia.
**Three cells thick ''or'' >15% of epithelial thickness.
*Papillae elongated.
*Papillae elongated.
**Papillae that reach into the top 1/3 of the epithelial layer - definition for GERD.<ref name=Ref_PBoD804>{{Ref PBoD|804}}</ref>


Notes:
Notes "abundant eosinophils":
*Criteria for number of eosinophils/area is '''''highly variable'''''; there is a 23X fold variation in published values and only 11% of studies actually define an area (most studies, embarassing, only give the number of eosinophils per "HPF")!<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal |author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ |title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=102 |issue=10 |pages=2300–13 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=17617209 |doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x |url=}}</ref>
*Criteria for number of eosinophils/area is '''''highly variable'''''; there is a 23X fold variation in published values and only 11% of studies actually define an area (most studies, embarassing for pathologists that understand this issue, only give the number of eosinophils per "HPF")!<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal |author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ |title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=102 |issue=10 |pages=2300–13 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=17617209 |doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x |url=}}</ref>
**The group that published the article cited above did another one... <ref name=pmid19830560>PMID 19830560.</ref>
**The group that published the article cited above did another one... <ref name=pmid19830560>PMID 19830560.</ref>
*The most commonly reported cut points are 15, 20 and 24 eosinophils/HPF, without defining HPF.<ref name=pmid17617209/>
*The most commonly reported cut points are 15, 20 and 24 eosinophils/HPF, without defining HPF.<ref name=pmid17617209/>
**The ''Foundation Series'' book<ref name=Ref_GLP19>{{Ref GLP|19}}</ref> says: "> 20/HPF"; VL sees this definition as garbage, as "HPF" is not defined (see rant in the ''[[basics]]'' article).
**The ''Foundation Series'' book<ref name=Ref_GLP19>{{Ref GLP|19}}</ref> says: "> 20/HPF"; [[VL]] sees this definition as garbage, as "HPF" is not defined (see [[HPFitis]]).
**There is a consensus paper<ref>{{cite journal |author=Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, ''et al.'' |title=Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment |journal=Gastroenterology |volume=133 |issue=4 |pages=1342–63 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=17919504 |doi=10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.017 |url=}}</ref> that makes note of [[HPFitis]]... and then goes on to ignore to whole issue by defining EE as 15/HPF.  It blows my mind that the people could so will fully blind and that the reviewers didn't understand this.
**There is a consensus paper<ref>{{cite journal |author=Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, ''et al.'' |title=Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment |journal=Gastroenterology |volume=133 |issue=4 |pages=1342–63 |year=2007 |month=October |pmid=17919504 |doi=10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.017 |url=}}</ref> that makes note of [[HPFitis]]... and then goes on to ignore to whole issue by defining EE as 15/HPF.  It blows my mind that the people could be so will fully blind and that the idiotic reviewers didn't understand this.
**Most resident microscopes at the Toronto teaching hospitals have 22 mm eye pieces and have for their highest magnification objective a 40X.  De facto, this means most people in Toronto are using the Liacouras ''et al.'' definition.<ref name=pmid16361045>{{cite journal |author=Liacouras CA, Spergel JM, Ruchelli E, ''et al.'' |title=Eosinophilic esophagitis: a 10-year experience in 381 children |journal=Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. |volume=3 |issue=12 |pages=1198–206 |year=2005 |month=December |pmid=16361045 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
**Most resident microscopes at the Toronto teaching hospitals have 22 mm eye pieces and have for their highest magnification objective a 40X.  De facto, this means most people in Toronto are using the Liacouras ''et al.'' definition.<ref name=pmid16361045>{{cite journal |author=Liacouras CA, Spergel JM, Ruchelli E, ''et al.'' |title=Eosinophilic esophagitis: a 10-year experience in 381 children |journal=Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. |volume=3 |issue=12 |pages=1198–206 |year=2005 |month=December |pmid=16361045 |doi= |url=}}</ref>


Image: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841420/figure/F0003/ Eosinophilic esophagitis (nih.gov)].
Images:  
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Eosinophilic_esophagitis_-_2_-_very_high_mag.jpg eosinophilic esophagitis - very high mag. (WC)].
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Eosinophilic_esophagitis_-_2_-_high_mag.jpg Eosinophilic esophagitis - high mag. (WC)].
*[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841420/figure/F0003/ Eosinophilic esophagitis (nih.gov)].


==Erosive esophagitis==
==Erosive esophagitis==
48,584

edits

Navigation menu