Difference between revisions of "Tumour deposit"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
27 bytes added ,  16:51, 10 August 2016
no edit summary
(split out)
Line 6: Line 6:


==General==
==General==
Significance:
*Poor prognosticator.
**Can be understood as a type of invasive front/border, e.g. ''well-circumscribed border'' versus ''infiltrative border''.<ref name=pmid24112678/>
==Definition==
Definition - TNM/AJCC 7th edition:<ref name=pmid21555695/>
Definition - TNM/AJCC 7th edition:<ref name=pmid21555695/>
*Microscopic or macroscopic nodule in the lymphatic drainage bed of the tumour.
*Microscopic or macroscopic nodule in the lymphatic drainage bed of the tumour.
Line 13: Line 18:
*#Irregular contour.
*#Irregular contour.
*#*Round nodules of tumour are considered lymph nodes that are replaced by tumour.
*#*Round nodules of tumour are considered lymph nodes that are replaced by tumour.
Significance:
*Poor prognosticator.
**Can be understood as a type of invasive front/border, e.g. ''well-circumscribed border'' versus ''infiltrative border''.<ref name=pmid24112678/>
Staging implications:
*Tumour deposits are '''not''' counted as (positive) lymph nodes<ref name=pmid21555695>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Nagtegaal | first1 = ID. | last2 = Tot | first2 = T. | last3 = Jayne | first3 = DG. | last4 = McShane | first4 = P. | last5 = Nihlberg | first5 = A. | last6 = Marshall | first6 = HC. | last7 = Påhlman | first7 = L. | last8 = Brown | first8 = JM. | last9 = Guillou | first9 = PJ. | title = Lymph nodes, tumor deposits, and TNM: are we getting better? | journal = J Clin Oncol | volume = 29 | issue = 18 | pages = 2487-92 | month = Jun | year = 2011 | doi = 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.6429 | PMID = 21555695 }}</ref> and in the context of positive lymph nodes do not change the [[Colorectal_cancer_staging#Nodal_stage|N stage]].
**If no positive lymph nodes are present, the N stage is pN1c.
*The T stage is ''not'' affected by tumour deposits.<ref name=pmid21555695/>


Notes:
Notes:
Line 30: Line 26:
#>=2 mm from the tumour front.
#>=2 mm from the tumour front.
#>=2 mm (radially) from the deepest aspect of the muscularis propria, if the tumour is not present in the plane of section.
#>=2 mm (radially) from the deepest aspect of the muscularis propria, if the tumour is not present in the plane of section.
==Staging==
Staging implications:
*Tumour deposits are '''not''' counted as (positive) lymph nodes<ref name=pmid21555695>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Nagtegaal | first1 = ID. | last2 = Tot | first2 = T. | last3 = Jayne | first3 = DG. | last4 = McShane | first4 = P. | last5 = Nihlberg | first5 = A. | last6 = Marshall | first6 = HC. | last7 = Påhlman | first7 = L. | last8 = Brown | first8 = JM. | last9 = Guillou | first9 = PJ. | title = Lymph nodes, tumor deposits, and TNM: are we getting better? | journal = J Clin Oncol | volume = 29 | issue = 18 | pages = 2487-92 | month = Jun | year = 2011 | doi = 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.6429 | PMID = 21555695 }}</ref> and in the context of positive lymph nodes do not change the [[Colorectal_cancer_staging#Nodal_stage|N stage]].
**If no positive lymph nodes are present, the N stage is pN1c.
*The T stage is ''not'' affected by tumour deposits.<ref name=pmid21555695/>


==See also==
==See also==
48,470

edits

Navigation menu