Difference between revisions of "Sessile serrated adenoma"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 117: Line 117:
</pre>
</pre>


The above exactly mirrors the Canadian consensus.<ref name=driman>{{cite journal | last1 = Driman | first1 = DK. | last2 = Marcus | first2 = VA. | last3 = Hilsden | first3 = RJ | last4 = Owen | first4 = DA |title=Pathologic reporting of colorectal polyps: pan-Canadian consensus guidelines |journal=Canadian Journal of Pathology |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=81-90 |year=2012 |month= |pmid= |doi= |url=http://andrewjohnpublishing.com/images/cjp%204-3.pdf }}</ref>
The above mirrors the Canadian consensus.<ref name=driman>{{cite journal | last1 = Driman | first1 = DK. | last2 = Marcus | first2 = VA. | last3 = Hilsden | first3 = RJ | last4 = Owen | first4 = DA |title=Pathologic reporting of colorectal polyps: pan-Canadian consensus guidelines |journal=Canadian Journal of Pathology |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=81-90 |year=2012 |month= |pmid= |doi= |url=http://andrewjohnpublishing.com/images/cjp%204-3.pdf }}</ref>


====Management====
====Sign out comment====
The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (2011) advocates the following statement:<ref>URL: [http://www.cancercare.ns.ca/site-cc/media/cancercare/Pathology%20Working%20Group_Phase%201%20Report_Final_Nov%202011_For%20Email.pdf http://www.cancercare.ns.ca/site-cc/media/cancercare/Pathology%20Working%20Group_Phase%201%20Report_Final_Nov%202011_For%20Email.pdf]. Accessed on: January 29, 2015.</ref>
The Canadian consensus<ref name=driman/> also advocates use of a comment, like the following statement:
<pre>
<pre>
Sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia are considered to be advanced lesions that  
Sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia are considered to be advanced lesions that  
48,460

edits

Navigation menu