Difference between revisions of "Anatomical pathology laboratory processes"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 79: Line 79:
*The thickness of the sections can make a difference in the interpretation.<ref name=pmid1915756>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Otto | first1 = MJ. | last2 = Löw | first2 = O. | last3 = Schneider | first3 = A. | title = The nominal section thickness--importance of their correction for morphometry. | journal = Exp Pathol | volume = 42 | issue = 3 | pages = 129-36 | month =  | year = 1991 | doi =  | PMID = 1915756 }}</ref>
*The thickness of the sections can make a difference in the interpretation.<ref name=pmid1915756>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Otto | first1 = MJ. | last2 = Löw | first2 = O. | last3 = Schneider | first3 = A. | title = The nominal section thickness--importance of their correction for morphometry. | journal = Exp Pathol | volume = 42 | issue = 3 | pages = 129-36 | month =  | year = 1991 | doi =  | PMID = 1915756 }}</ref>
**Routine sections are cut at 3-4 micrometres.
**Routine sections are cut at 3-4 micrometres.
***3 micrometres is considered ideal.<ref>LE. 20 January 2015.</ref>
***3 micrometres is considered ideal for GI biopsies and prostate biopsies.<ref>LE. 20 January 2015.</ref>


===Staining===
===Staining===
48,466

edits

Navigation menu