48,830
edits
Difference between revisions of "Kidney tumours"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→ISUP grading
| Line 397: | Line 397: | ||
Notes: | Notes: | ||
* | *Higher grade component trumps lower grade component. | ||
**No agreed upon minimum quantity of high grade component for upgrading. | |||
***37% use 1 field of view with the x10 objective. † | |||
***41% use 1 field of view with the x40 objective. ‡ | |||
*Grading system ''not'' used for ''chromophobe RCC''. | |||
**Experience with ''Fuhrman grading'' showed it is ''not'' prognostic for chromophobe RCC.<ref name=pmid17527087>{{Cite journal | last1 = Delahunt | first1 = B. | last2 = Sika-Paotonu | first2 = D. | last3 = Bethwaite | first3 = PB. | last4 = McCredie | first4 = MR. | last5 = Martignoni | first5 = G. | last6 = Eble | first6 = JN. | last7 = Jordan | first7 = TW. | title = Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. | journal = Am J Surg Pathol | volume = 31 | issue = 6 | pages = 957-60 | month = Jun | year = 2007 | doi = 10.1097/01.pas.0000249446.28713.53 | PMID = 17527087 }}</ref>). | |||
Additions notes: | |||
*† Suffers from [[IPFitis]]. | |||
*‡ Suffers from [[HPFitis]]. | |||
==Clear cell renal cell carcinoma== | ==Clear cell renal cell carcinoma== | ||