48,830
edits
Difference between revisions of "Urothelial carcinoma in situ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→IHC
(→IHC) |
(→IHC) |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
==IHC== | ==IHC== | ||
ISUP consensus panel:<ref name=pmid25025364 >{{cite journal |author=Amin MB, Epstein JI, Ulbright TM, ''et al.'' |title=Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in urologic pathology: report from the international society of urological pathology consensus conference |journal=Am. J. Surg. Pathol. |volume=38 |issue=8 |pages=1017–22 |year=2014 |month=August |pmid=25025364 |doi=10.1097/PAS.0000000000000254 |url=}}</ref> | |||
*CK20 +ve in deep cells. | *CK20 +ve in deep cells. | ||
**Normal urothelium -- only the umbrella cells. | **Normal urothelium -- only the umbrella cells. | ||
*p53 +ve. | *p53 +ve. | ||
*CD44 -ve. | *CD44 -ve. | ||
**Positive in ''indeterminant'' and ''negative''. | |||
=== | ===Another panel=== | ||
Another panel for benign urothelium versus CIS:<ref name=pmid16932015>{{Cite journal | last1 = Yin | first1 = H. | last2 = He | first2 = Q. | last3 = Li | first3 = T. | last4 = Leong | first4 = AS. | title = Cytokeratin 20 and Ki-67 to distinguish carcinoma in situ from flat non-neoplastic urothelium. | journal = Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol | volume = 14 | issue = 3 | pages = 260-5 | month = Sep | year = 2006 | doi = | PMID = 16932015 }}</ref> | Another panel for benign urothelium versus CIS:<ref name=pmid16932015>{{Cite journal | last1 = Yin | first1 = H. | last2 = He | first2 = Q. | last3 = Li | first3 = T. | last4 = Leong | first4 = AS. | title = Cytokeratin 20 and Ki-67 to distinguish carcinoma in situ from flat non-neoplastic urothelium. | journal = Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol | volume = 14 | issue = 3 | pages = 260-5 | month = Sep | year = 2006 | doi = | PMID = 16932015 }}</ref> | ||
*[[CK20]] +ve in deep cells (23/26 cases). | *[[CK20]] +ve in deep cells (23/26 cases). | ||
| Line 94: | Line 95: | ||
**Normal ~10% of cells, confined to basal aspect. | **Normal ~10% of cells, confined to basal aspect. | ||
*CD44 -ve.<ref name=pmid24225842>{{Cite journal | last1 = Aron | first1 = M. | last2 = Luthringer | first2 = DJ. | last3 = McKenney | first3 = JK. | last4 = Hansel | first4 = DE. | last5 = Westfall | first5 = DE. | last6 = Parakh | first6 = R. | last7 = Mohanty | first7 = SK. | last8 = Balzer | first8 = B. | last9 = Amin | first9 = MB. | title = Utility of a triple antibody cocktail intraurothelial neoplasm-3 (IUN-3-CK20/CD44s/p53) and α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in the distinction of urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) and reactive urothelial atypia. | journal = Am J Surg Pathol | volume = 37 | issue = 12 | pages = 1815-23 | month = Dec | year = 2013 | doi = 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000114 | PMID = 24225842 }}</ref> | *CD44 -ve.<ref name=pmid24225842>{{Cite journal | last1 = Aron | first1 = M. | last2 = Luthringer | first2 = DJ. | last3 = McKenney | first3 = JK. | last4 = Hansel | first4 = DE. | last5 = Westfall | first5 = DE. | last6 = Parakh | first6 = R. | last7 = Mohanty | first7 = SK. | last8 = Balzer | first8 = B. | last9 = Amin | first9 = MB. | title = Utility of a triple antibody cocktail intraurothelial neoplasm-3 (IUN-3-CK20/CD44s/p53) and α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in the distinction of urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) and reactive urothelial atypia. | journal = Am J Surg Pathol | volume = 37 | issue = 12 | pages = 1815-23 | month = Dec | year = 2013 | doi = 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000114 | PMID = 24225842 }}</ref> | ||
**Positive in ''indeterminant'' and ''negative''. | **Positive in ''indeterminant'' and ''negative''. | ||