Difference between revisions of "Immunohistochemical staining"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
This is an evolving area in pathology that has been ignored for a surprisingly long time.   
This is an evolving area in pathology that has been ignored for a surprisingly long time.   


It is touched upon the in the ''[[quality]]'' article in the ''[[Quality#Immunohistochemistry|immunohistochemistry]]'' section.
It is touched upon the in the ''[[quality]]'' article in the ''[[Quality#Immunohistochemistry|immunohistochemistry]]'' section
 
==Interpretation==
To determine whether a stain is (1) done correctly, and (2) positive, one needs to know:
#What tissues it stains:
#*Tumour.
#*Normal tissue.
#How it stains the various tissues:
#*Patchy.
#*Diffuse.
#Where it stains the various tissued:
#*Nucleus.
#*Cytoplasm.
#*Membrane.
#*A combination of the above.


Generally, interpretations are subjective, and this is especially true when the staining is weak and focal. In other words, "... your weak [positive] stain might be somebody else’s negative."<ref>URL: [http://bitesizebio.com/articles/immunohistochemistry-getting-the-stain-you-want/ http://bitesizebio.com/articles/immunohistochemistry-getting-the-stain-you-want/]. Accessed on: 1 September 2012.</ref>   
Generally, interpretations are subjective, and this is especially true when the staining is weak and focal. In other words, "... your weak [positive] stain might be somebody else’s negative."<ref>URL: [http://bitesizebio.com/articles/immunohistochemistry-getting-the-stain-you-want/ http://bitesizebio.com/articles/immunohistochemistry-getting-the-stain-you-want/]. Accessed on: 1 September 2012.</ref>   
48,830

edits

Navigation menu