Difference between revisions of "Libre Pathology:Manual of style"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Standard headings== | ==Standard headings== | ||
*General - this includes, clinical information, prognosis and treatment. | *General - this includes, clinical information, prognosis and treatment. | ||
*Gross. | |||
*Microscopic. | *Microscopic. | ||
*Stains. | |||
*IHC. | *IHC. | ||
*Molecular (optional). | *Molecular (optional). | ||
*Sign out. | |||
==Microscopic (heading)== | ==Microscopic (heading)== | ||
Revision as of 17:06, 16 January 2013
This page describes the format of the onlinepathology, i.e. this web site.
Name of entity
- Ideally should be WHO name.
- E.g. pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma, not malignant fibrous histiocytoma.
- Names should reflect the pathogenesis as is understood currently.
- E.g. keratocystic odontogenic tumour, not odontogenic keratocyst.
- The use of common misnomers is discouraged.
- Some terms are tolerated... if they are very common, e.g. pyogenic granuloma (better term would be lobular capillary hemangioma).
- Other names are listed under the heading with also known as (AKA).
Standard headings
- General - this includes, clinical information, prognosis and treatment.
- Gross.
- Microscopic.
- Stains.
- IHC.
- Molecular (optional).
- Sign out.
Microscopic (heading)
- The key feature(s) should be marked.
- Definition: A key feature is a distinctive common feature that strongly favours the given diagnosis and whose absense would strongly disfavour the diagnosis or exclude it.
- Examples:
- Eosinophils in eosinophilic esophagitis.
- Nuclear atypia at the free surface in tubular adenoma.
- Examples:
- Definition: A key feature is a distinctive common feature that strongly favours the given diagnosis and whose absense would strongly disfavour the diagnosis or exclude it.