Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(fix typos)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
1. J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):838-43; quiz 1129. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
1. J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):838-43; quiz 1129. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
2. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;1(2):257-262. doi: 10.3892/mco.2013.69. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
2. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;1(2):257-262. doi: 10.3892/mco.2013.69. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
===Alternate===
The tumour's morphology is NOT in keeping with a small cell neuroendocrine (NE) component (the tumour cells have too much cytoplasm) and NOT in keeping with a large cell NE component (the tumour cells have nucleoli and eosinophilic/clear cytoplasm).
This case has neuroendocrine (NE) staining (CD56, synaptophysin); however, it does NOT have a typical NE morphology. As such, the case does NOT have a definite neuroendocrine component. However, NE marker positivity is predictive of hormone refractive disease.
48,860

edits

Navigation menu