Difference between revisions of "Kidney tumours"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
388 bytes added ,  05:23, 30 July 2014
Line 397: Line 397:


Notes:  
Notes:  
*Not used for ''chromophobe RCC'' (Fuhrman grading was ''not prognostic''<ref name=pmid17527087>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Delahunt | first1 = B. | last2 = Sika-Paotonu | first2 = D. | last3 = Bethwaite | first3 = PB. | last4 = McCredie | first4 = MR. | last5 = Martignoni | first5 = G. | last6 = Eble | first6 = JN. | last7 = Jordan | first7 = TW. | title = Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. | journal = Am J Surg Pathol | volume = 31 | issue = 6 | pages = 957-60 | month = Jun | year = 2007 | doi = 10.1097/01.pas.0000249446.28713.53 | PMID = 17527087 }}</ref>).
*Higher grade component trumps lower grade component.
**No agreed upon minimum quantity of high grade component for upgrading.
***37% use 1 field of view with the x10 objective. †
***41% use 1 field of view with the x40 objective. ‡
*Grading system ''not'' used for ''chromophobe RCC''.
**Experience with ''Fuhrman grading'' showed it is ''not'' prognostic for chromophobe RCC.<ref name=pmid17527087>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Delahunt | first1 = B. | last2 = Sika-Paotonu | first2 = D. | last3 = Bethwaite | first3 = PB. | last4 = McCredie | first4 = MR. | last5 = Martignoni | first5 = G. | last6 = Eble | first6 = JN. | last7 = Jordan | first7 = TW. | title = Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. | journal = Am J Surg Pathol | volume = 31 | issue = 6 | pages = 957-60 | month = Jun | year = 2007 | doi = 10.1097/01.pas.0000249446.28713.53 | PMID = 17527087 }}</ref>).
 
Additions notes:
*† Suffers from [[IPFitis]].
*‡ Suffers from [[HPFitis]].


==Clear cell renal cell carcinoma==
==Clear cell renal cell carcinoma==
48,771

edits

Navigation menu