Ovarian tumours
The article examines ovarian tumours including ovarian cancer.
Classification
The Latta rule of fives
Can be divided as follows:[1][2]
- Surface epithelial tumours (most common).
- Sex cord stromal tumours (SCSTs).
- Germ cell tumours (GCTs).
- Metastatic tumours.
- Rare stuff that doesn't fit in any of the above (e.g. leiomyoma, angiosarcoma).
Surface epithelial tumours:
- Serous.
- Endometrioid.
- Mucinous.
- Brenner tumour.
- Clear cell carcinoma.
Sex cord stromal tumours:
- Granulosa cell tumour (adult type, juvenile type).
- Sertoli cell tumour.
- Leydig cell tumour.
- Fibroma.
- Thecoma.
Germ cell tumours:
- Dysgerminoma.
- Endodermal sinus tumour (yolk sac tumour).
- Embryonal tumour.
- Choriocarcinoma.
- Teratoma.
Tumours associated with endometriosis:[3]
- Endometrioid.
- Clear cell carcinoma.
- Endocervical mucinous (AKA Seroumucinous type and Muellerian type).
Solid ovarian tumours
Simple version: basically anything sex cord stromal.
List:[4]
- Brenner tumour.
- SCSTs:
- Fibroma.
- Thecoma.
- Fibrothecoma.
- Leydig tumour.
- Sertoli cell tumour.
- Sertoli-Leydig tumour.
- Granulosa cell tumour.
- Granulosa-theca cell tumour.
Approach
Where is the tumour arising?
- Central location -- think GCTs and SCST.
- Surface of ovary -- think surface epithelial tumour.
- If no surface is apparent... possibly obliterated by tumour.
Spindle cell morphology?
- Consider sex cord stromal tumours.
Nests of cells?
- Consider Brenner tumour.
Gland-like structures?
- Endometrioid carcinoma.
- Granuloma cell tumour.
- Def'n: Cellular debris within gland lumen.[5]
- Characteristic of colorectal adenocarcinoma, may be absent in ovarian tumours -- limited value.[6]
Grading of ovarian cancer
- Silverberg grading system,[7] aka universal grading system.
- Based on pattern, cytologic atypia and mitotic rate.
- System somewhat similar to breast grading, which can be remembered as: TMN (tubular formation, mitotic rate, nuclear atypia).
Silverberg system
- Pattern:
- Glandular = 1.
- Papillary = 2.
- Solid = 3.
- Cytologic atypia:
- Slight = 1.
- Moderate = 2.
- Marked = 3.
- Mitoses (see note below):
- 0-9/(0.345 x10 mm^2) = 1.
- 10-24/(0.345 x10 mm^2) = 2.
- >=25/(0.345 x10 mm^2) = 3.
Composite score (pattern score + cytologic score + mitotic score):
- Grade I = 3-5.
- Grade II = 6-7.
- Grade III = 8-9.
Note 1:
- Most resident microscopes have an eyepiece diameter of 22 mm. Thus, the approximate field diameter is 0.55 mm (22 mm/40 X = 0.55 mm), at highest magnification, and the field area is 0.23758 mm^2 (pi*(0.55/2)^2=0.23758 mm^2).
- The number of HPFs should be adjusted if the area per field is different than 0.345 mm^2.
- If the field diameter is 0.55 mm and the sample area is 3.45 mm^2, this is equivalent to 14.52 HPFs (3.45 mm^2 / 0.23758 mm^2 = 14.52); thus, it would be appropriate to use 15 HPFs and the cut points above.
Note 2:
- A not-so-good alternative is to adjust the number of mitotic counts a keep the number of HPFs (10) constant.
- If the mitotic rate per area is held constant, and the cut points are 9, 10 and 24, the equivalent mitoses per area are:
- 0-4 mitoses/((HPF of 0.345 mm^2) x 10) = 1.
- 5-11 mitoses/((HPF of 0.345 mm^2) x 10) = 2.
- 12+ mitoses/((HPF of 0.345 mm^2) x 10) = 3.
- If the mitotic rate per area is held constant, and the cut points are 9, 10 and 24, the equivalent mitoses per area are:
Value of Silverberg...
Good correlation with five year survival (rounded values):[8]
- Grade I = 90%.
- Grade II = 65%.
- Grade III = 40%.
Surface epithelial tumours
Most common subtypes - in short:[9]
- Serous:
- Columnar cells,
- Cilia,
- Psammoma bodies,
- Papillae;
- Endometrioid:
- Tubular glands;
- Mucinous:
- Tall columnar cells with mucin,
- Glands with mucin.
Where to start when considering a malignant (epithelial) tumour of the ovary:
Serous | Endometrioid | Mucinous | |
Characteristics | cilia, columnar cells psammoma bodies, papillary arch. |
gland forming, endometrium-like | mucinous glands, colon-like |
Differentiators | cilia, psammoma bodies | squamous metaplasia | mucin, lack of necrosis |
Associations | atrophy | endometriosis, endometrial hyperplasia | (?) |
Typical age | usually 60s+ | 40-60 | varies (?) |
Grade | typically high grade | typically low grade | often low |
IHC | p53 +ve (diffuse), WT-1 +ve, CA-125 +ve, D2-40 +ve | WT-1 -ve | CK7 +ve, CK20 +ve (other tumours CK7 +ve, CK20 -ve) |
Main DDx | poorly diff. endometrioid | serous | metastatic tumour (usually GI) |
Serous tumours
Classification[10]
- Benign.
- Borderline.
- May have pseudostratification of epithelial cells.
- "Usually, borderline if first impression is borderline."[11]
- Malignant.
- Cytologic atypia.
- Many papillae.
Microscopy[12]
- Tubal like epithelium:
- Ciliated.
- Columnar.
- Papillae.
- Psammoma bodies (concentric calcifications).
Note:
- In serous borderline tumours, micropapillae are thought to have significance -- assoc. with increased risk of distant recurrence[13][14] - though is disputed.[15]
Mucinous tumours
- May arise in endometriosis[16]
Gross
- Multiloculated.
- Sticky, gelatinous fluid (glycoprotein).
Micro
- Tall columnar cells in glands.
- Apical mucin.
- May vaguely resemble colorectal adenocarcinoma.
- Glands have mucin.
- +/-Nuclear atypia.
- NO cilia.
Subtypes
- Endocervical type.
- Less likely to be malignant.
- More common than malignant type.
- Intestinal type.
- More likely to be malignant.
- Goblet cells. (???)
- One large clear apical vacuole.
- If it doesn't look like intestine to you... it probably isn't.
- May vaguely resemble colorectal adenocarcinoma (hyperchromatic, columnar nuclei, nuclear pleomorphism).
- Image: [4]
Comparison of mucosa:
- Normal endocervical mucosa: endocervical mucosa.
- Normal colonic mucosa: colonic type mucosa.
Classification
- Benign. (Dx: mucinous cystadenoma)
- Single layer of cells.
- Borderline. (Dx: mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential or borderline mucinous tumour)
- Papillae.
- Malignant. (Dx: mucinous adenocarcinoma)
- Usually intestinal subtype.
Note:
- Tumours may be heterogenous; benign appearing epithelium may be beside clearly malignant epithelium.
- Good sampling of mucinous tumours, i.e. many blocks, is important to lessen the chance of undercalling them.
Endometrioid tumours of the ovary
Epidemiology
- Associated with endometriosis, i.e. people with endometriosis are more likely to have 'em.
Histology
- Tubular glands.
- Cribriform pattern common.[17]
- May see mucinous secretion.[18]
- May have squamous differentiation/squamous metaplasia (useful for differentiating from sex-cord stromal tumours and germ cell tumours).[18] - very useful feature.
Clear cell adenocarcinoma
General
- Thought to be related to endometrioid carcinoma.[19]
- Increased risk of CC adenoca in people with endometriosis.
- Worse prognosis vs. other surface epithelial tumours[20]
Histology
- Hobnail morphology (apical surface larger than basal surface)[21] -- key feature
- "Nuclei bulge into the lumen".
- Hyaline droplet -- common, as in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
- Clear cells -- cytoplasm is clear.
Note:
- Clear cell adenocarcinoma does not have to have clear cells... yes, this is stupid; it is like papillary thyroid carcinoma (which often isn't papillary).
Brenner tumour
Epidemiology
- Mostly benign clinical course.
- Thought to arise from Walthard cell nest.
- Frequently an incidental finding, i.e. oophorectomy was done for another reason.
Gross
- Solid.
Microscopy
- Nests of transitional epithelium.[22]
- "Coffee bean nucleus".
- Elliptical shape (nucleus).
- nuclear grooves.[23]
- distinct nucleoli.[24]
Images:
- "Coffee bean" nuclei (wikimedia.org).
- [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brenner_tumour2.jpg Brenner tumour - low magnifiction (wikimedia.org).
Note:
- DDx of Coffee bean nucleus = granulosa cell tumour
Germ cell tumours
These tumour are relatively uncommon, though are the most common grouping for young women.[25]
Overview
- Dysgerminoma (most common).
- Female version of seminoma.
- Yolk sac tumour (endodermal sinus tumour).
- Embryonal carcinoma.
- Choriocarcinoma.
- Teratoma.
- Mixed GCT - 60% of GCTs are mixed.
- Common combinations:
- Teratoma + embryonal carcinoma + endodermal sinus tumour (yolk sac tumour) (TEE).
- Seminoma + embryonal (SE).
- Embryonal + teratoma (TE).
- Common combinations:
Mnemonic: SEE CT, S=Seminoma, Embryonal carcinoma, Endodermal Sinus Tumour, Choriocarcinoma, Teratoma.
Teratoma
Three types:
- Mature (benign) - common.
- Immature (malignant).
- Monodermal (highly specialized).
Specialized teratomas
- Struma ovarii (thyroid tumour).
- Thyroid tissue - colloid is seen.
- Carcinoid - rare.
- 'Typical neuroendocrine appearance' - nuclei with stippled chromatin (salt-and-pepper chromatin).
Dysgerminoma
General
Microscopy
- Fried egg appearance (clear cytoplasm, central nucleus).
- Nuclear membrane has "corners", i.e. is "squared-off" - or "polygonal".
- +/- Lymphocytes - often prominent.
- +/- Granulomata.
Epidemiology
- Most common GCT in females.
- Prognosis usually good.
Dysgerminoma vs lymphoma:
- dysgerminoma has "squared-off" nuclei,[27] i.e. the nuclei look are polygonal-shaped.
Sex cord stromal tumours
Granulosa-theca tumours
NEED TO FIX.
Granulosa component
General
- Adult and juvenile variants.
- Juvenile variant - more nuclear pleomorphism.
- Secrete estrogen.
- May present with endometrial pathology, e.g. endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma.
Gross
- Solid.
Microscopy
- Classic appearance includes gland-like structures filled with acidophilic material (Call-Exner bodies).
- Small cuboidal to polygonal cell in sheets or stands or cords.
IHC
- Inhibin positive.[29]
- Inhibin negative in Brenner tumour.
DDx:
- UCC.
- UCC usually has extensive necrosis.
- Brenner tumour (???).
Fibroma-thecoma group
- Some say fibromas and thecomas are related,[30] while others believe they should be considered distinct entities.[31]
- A combination of a fibroma and a thecoma is known as a fibrothecoma.
Note:
- Some discourage the use of the term fibrothecoma and sugguest calling tumours in the fibrom-thecoma group fibroma unless there are lipid-laden cells and more than minimal alpha-inhibin positivity.[28]
Fibroma
General
- Part of Meigs syndrome (mnemonic FAR: fibroma, ascites, right pleural effusion).
- Assoc. with basal cell nevus syndrome.[32]
Microscopy
- Spindle-shaped cells.
- Central nuclei.
- Stainable lipid - minimal or none.[28]
IHC
- Inhibin -ve (~75%).[28]
Thecoma
- Assoc. with compression & atrophy of ovarian cortex, thought to arise from medulla.[31]
- Alpha-inhibin +ve (90%+).[28]
- Approx. 50% have symptoms related to estrogen secretion.[28]
- May also be viralizing.
Histology
Features:[28]
- Nuclei with oval to spindle morphology.
- Abundant cytoplasm that is pale, vaculolated -- key feature.
Sertoli-Ledydig tumour
General
- AKA androblastoma.
Microscopy[34]
- Tubules with Sertoli or Leydig cells + stroma.
- +/- Sarcomatous features (mucinous glands, bone, cartilage).
Pure Leydig cell tumour
General
- AKA Hilus cell tumour.
Microscopy
- Reinke crystalloids - in the cytoplasm of Leydig cells - testis article.
Gonadoblastoma
General
- Abnormal sexual development.
- Often coexist with dysgerminoma.
Microscopy
- Immature germ cells resembling Sertoli cells and granulosa cells.[35]
Metastatic ovarian tumours
- Mostly muellerian origin (uterus, fallopian tube) or pelvic peritoneum.
Extramuellerian metastatic tumours
- Breast.
- gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
- Pseudomyxoma peritonei (appendiceal).
- Krukenberg tumour = signet ring cell cancer with mucin production of GI origin.
Benign
Benign mesothelial inclusion cyst
Epidemiology
- Assoc. with previous surgery.
- May be found incidentally, e.g. during C-section.
Gross
Microscopy
- Benign mesothelium.
- Single layer of squamoid or cuboid mesothelial cells.[37]
IHC
- CK +ve, calretinin +ve.[37]
See also
References
- ↑ PBoD P.1093.
- ↑ LAE. 22 October 2009.
- ↑ LAE. 22 October 2009.
- ↑ NEED REF.
- ↑ http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/genetics-terms-alphalist/all#D
- ↑ DeCostanzo DC, Elias JM, Chumas JC (July 1997). "Necrosis in 84 ovarian carcinomas: a morphologic study of primary versus metastatic colonic carcinoma with a selective immunohistochemical analysis of cytokeratin subtypes and carcinoembryonic antigen". Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 16 (3): 245–9. PMID 9421090.
- ↑ Silverberg SG (January 2000). "Histopathologic grading of ovarian carcinoma: a review and proposal". Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 19 (1): 7-15. PMID 10638449. http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0277-1691&volume=19&issue=1&spage=7.
- ↑ Sato Y, Shimamoto T, Amada S, Asada Y, Hayashi T (January 2003). "Prognostic value of histologic grading of ovarian carcinomas". Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 22 (1): 52-6. PMID 12496698. http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0277-1691&volume=22&issue=1&spage=52.
- ↑ PBoD PP.1096-7.
- ↑ PBoD P.1096???
- ↑ LAE 19 Feb 2009.
- ↑ PBoD P.1096.
- ↑ [LAE 19 Feb 2009]
- ↑ Piura B, Rabinovich A, Yanai-Inbar I (2000). "Micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary: case report and review of literature". Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 21 (4): 374–6. PMID 11055486.
- ↑ Prat J, De Nictolis M (September 2002). "Serous borderline tumors of the ovary: a long-term follow-up study of 137 cases, including 18 with a micropapillary pattern and 20 with microinvasion". Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 26 (9): 1111-28. PMID 12218568. http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0147-5185&volume=26&issue=9&spage=1111.
- ↑ PBoD P.1097.
- ↑ Khalifa 2008.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Baker P, Oliva E (July 2008). "A practical approach to intraoperative consultation in gynecological pathology". Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 27 (3): 353-65. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e31815c24fe. PMID 18580313.
- ↑ PBoD P.1098.
- ↑ Hauptmann S, Köbel M (2005). "[Prognostic factors in ovarian carcinoma]" (in German). Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 89: 92-100. PMID 18035678.
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ PBoD P.1098.
- ↑ [2]
- ↑ [3]
- ↑ NEED REF.
- ↑ PBoD P.1101
- ↑ Baker P, Oliva E (July 2008). "A practical approach to intraoperative consultation in gynecological pathology". Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 27 (3): 353?65. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e31815c24fe. PMID 18580313.
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 28.5 28.6 28.7 28.8 Roth LM (July 2006). "Recent advances in the pathology and classification of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors". Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 25 (3): 199–215. doi:10.1097/01.pgp.0000192271.22289.e6. PMID 16810055.
- ↑ PBoD P.1102.
- ↑ http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/ovarytumor.html#fibroma
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 Nocito AL, Sarancone S, Bacchi C, Tellez T (February 2008). "Ovarian thecoma: clinicopathological analysis of 50 cases". Ann Diagn Pathol 12 (1): 12–6. doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2007.01.011. PMID 18164409.
- ↑ PBoD P.1103.
- ↑ http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/ovarytumor.html#fibroma
- ↑ PBoD P.1103.
- ↑ PBoD P.1104.
- ↑ GAG 26 Feb 2009.
- ↑ 37.0 37.1 37.2 Urbanczyk K, Skotniczny K, Kucinski J, Friediger J (2005). "Mesothelial inclusion cysts (so-called benign cystic mesothelioma)--a clinicopathological analysis of six cases". Pol J Pathol 56 (2): 81-7. PMID 16092670.