Difference between revisions of "Vermiform appendix"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
769 bytes added ,  18:36, 8 April 2013
Line 202: Line 202:
:''Benign appendiceal [[mucocele]]'' and ''appendiceal mucocele'' redirect here.
:''Benign appendiceal [[mucocele]]'' and ''appendiceal mucocele'' redirect here.
===General===
===General===
*Classification is controversial.
*There are many classifications and they are controversial.<ref name=pmid21970481>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Panarelli | first1 = NC. | last2 = Yantiss | first2 = RK. | title = Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix and peritoneum. | journal = Arch Pathol Lab Med | volume = 135 | issue = 10 | pages = 1261-8 | month = Oct | year = 2011 | doi = 10.5858/arpa.2011-0034-RA | PMID = 21970481 }}</ref>
**The controversy centres on whether to call all mucinous tumours outside of the appendix adenocarcinoma - regardless of whether they have atypia & show invasion.
**The controversy centres on whether to call all mucinous tumours outside of the appendix ''adenocarcinoma'' - regardless of whether they have atypia & show invasion.
*''Panarelli and Yantiss'' created a nice summary table - that compare the classifications - see: [http://www.archivesofpathology.org/action/showFullPopup?id=i1543-2165-135-10-1261-t01&doi=10.5858%2Farpa.2011-0034-RA comparison of classifications (archivesofpathology.org)].<ref name=pmid21970481/>
*In women - an ovarian primary must be excluded.
*In women - an ovarian primary must be excluded.
**Concurrent ''bilateral'' ovarian tumours suggests the tumour originated from the appendix and spread to the ovaries.
**Concurrent ''bilateral'' ovarian tumours suggests the tumour originated from the appendix and spread to the ovaries.
*[[Onlinepathology]] prefers the classification of Misdraji,<ref name=pmid12883241>{{cite journal |author=Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH |title=Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases |journal=Am. J. Surg. Pathol. |volume=27 |issue=8 |pages=1089–103 |year=2003 |month=August |pmid=12883241 |doi= |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0147-5185&volume=27&issue=8&spage=1089}}</ref> as it is the least complicated


Classification:<ref name=pmid12883241>{{cite journal |author=Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH |title=Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases |journal=Am. J. Surg. Pathol. |volume=27 |issue=8 |pages=1089–103 |year=2003 |month=August |pmid=12883241 |doi= |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0147-5185&volume=27&issue=8&spage=1089}}</ref>
====Misdraji Classification====
*Benign - ''low grade mucinous tumour''.
*Benign - ''low grade mucinous tumour''.
*Borderline - ''mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential'' or ''borderline mucinous tumour''.
*Borderline - ''mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential'' or ''borderline mucinous tumour''.
48,589

edits

Navigation menu