Difference between revisions of "Informatics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(tweak) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Open source== | ==Open source== | ||
Open source in pathology appears to be | Open source in pathology appears to be some way off. One paper,<ref name=pmid15563662>{{cite journal |author=Rubin A |title=An open pathology computer system |journal=J. Clin. Pathol. |volume=57 |issue=12 |pages=1252–3 |year=2004 |month=December |pmid=15563662 |pmc=1770514 |doi=10.1136/jcp.2004.020826 |url=}}</ref> gives me a bit of hope -- though I think this is a voice in the wilderness. | ||
The radiologists are more on the ball here, e.g. [http://www.mii.ucla.edu/opensourcepacs-download-2/ UCLA's OpenSourcePACS].<ref name=pmid17249408>{{Cite journal | last1 = Bui | first1 = AA. | last2 = Morioka | first2 = C. | last3 = Dionisio | first3 = JD. | last4 = Johnson | first4 = DB. | last5 = Sinha | first5 = U. | last6 = Ardekani | first6 = S. | last7 = Taira | first7 = RK. | last8 = Aberle | first8 = DR. | last9 = El-Saden | first9 = S. | title = OpenSourcePACS: an extensible infrastructure for medical image management. | journal = IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed | volume = 11 | issue = 1 | pages = 94-109 | month = Jan | year = 2007 | doi = | PMID = 17249408 }}</ref> | |||
The radiologists are more on the ball here, e.g. [http://www.mii.ucla.edu/ | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 27 April 2012
Informatics is the management of information.
Pathologists, unfortunately, only have abysmal tools for this job.
The two main clinical information systems (Softpath and CoPath) are pathetic and look like they are out of the early 1990s.
Software in use at pathology departments
Information systems
- Softpath - in one word: awful. It is hard to believe people buy licenses for this.
- CoPath - considered state-of-the-art... the only thing going for it is: it sucks less than Softpath.
Dictation
Content management
Pathology wikis
Main article: Pathology wikis
- Wiki use for the dissemination of pathology knowledge is increasing.
- In the general sphere, Wikipedia is dominating a will probably continue to do so.[1]
Open source
Open source in pathology appears to be some way off. One paper,[2] gives me a bit of hope -- though I think this is a voice in the wilderness.
The radiologists are more on the ball here, e.g. UCLA's OpenSourcePACS.[3]
See also
References
- ↑ Heilman, JM.; Kemmann, E.; Bonert, M.; Chatterjee, A.; Ragar, B.; Beards, GM.; Iberri, DJ.; Harvey, M. et al. (2011). "Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion.". J Med Internet Res 13 (1): e14. doi:10.2196/jmir.1589. PMID 21282098.
- ↑ Rubin A (December 2004). "An open pathology computer system". J. Clin. Pathol. 57 (12): 1252–3. doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.020826. PMC 1770514. PMID 15563662. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1770514/.
- ↑ Bui, AA.; Morioka, C.; Dionisio, JD.; Johnson, DB.; Sinha, U.; Ardekani, S.; Taira, RK.; Aberle, DR. et al. (Jan 2007). "OpenSourcePACS: an extensible infrastructure for medical image management.". IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11 (1): 94-109. PMID 17249408.