Difference between revisions of "Waffle diagnosis"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
504 bytes added ,  15:17, 28 February 2011
pathobiology
(tweak some more)
(pathobiology)
Line 2: Line 2:


==Points to remember==
==Points to remember==
# These diagnoses essentially say "I don't know".
# These diagnoses essentially say "I don't know"/"I cannot call it benign & I cannot call it suspicious".
# Their use should be minimized.
# Their use should be minimized.
#* The use of these diagnoses are often used as quality measures.
#* The use of these diagnoses are often used as quality measures.
#** Pathologists that use 'em too often aren't doing a good job.
#** Pathologists that use 'em too often aren't doing a good job.
# Generally, they are not considered to have a distinct pathobiology.<ref name=pmid17378841>{{cite journal |author=Flury SC, Galgano MT, Mills SE, Smolkin ME, Theodorescu D |title=Atypical small acinar proliferation: biopsy artefact or distinct pathological entity |journal=BJU International |volume=99 |issue=4 |pages=780-5 |year=2007 |month=January |pmid= 17378841 |doi= |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118508438/abstract}}</ref>


==Examples==
==Examples==
48,466

edits

Navigation menu