Difference between revisions of "Molecular pathology"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Tabular comparisons: +another table)
Line 21: Line 21:
|-
|-
| in situ hybridization (ISH)
| in situ hybridization (ISH)
| good way to find gene losses and duplications (one colour) and gene splits and fusions (two colours); intermediate resolution - better resolution than karyotyping for specific target
| good way to find gene losses and duplications (one colour) and gene splits and fusions (two colours); intermediate resolution - better resolution than karyotyping for the specific target of the given ISH
| target specific (if the target is wrong no information is gained ''or'' one is mislead by negative result); NOT good for "going on a fishing expedition", i.e. looking for changes when one doesn't quite know what is wrong
| target specific (if the target is wrong no information is gained ''or'' one is mislead by the negative result); NOT good for "going on a fishing expedition", i.e. looking for changes when one doesn't quite know what is wrong
|-
|-
| karyotyping
| karyotyping
| finds large scale gains, losses and rearrangements; good for "going on a fishing expedition", i.e. looking for changes when one doesn't quite know what is wrong
| finds large scale gains, losses and rearrangements; good for "going on a fishing expedition", i.e. looking for changes when one doesn't quite know what is wrong
| low resolution (completely misses small scale changes)
| low resolution (completely misses small scale changes); requires fresh tissue/cell culture (as it is based on metaphase nuclei)
|-
|-
| PCR + sequencing ''or'' enzyme digestion and electrophoresis
| PCR + sequencing ''or'' enzyme digestion and electrophoresis
| high resolution (can find very small changes, e.g. base pair substitutions)
| high resolution (can find very small changes, e.g. base pair substitutions); can be done on formalin fixed parafin embedded tissue
| expensive; thus, limited to small regions; sequencing is the gold standard but very costly; enzyme digestion and electrophoresis is a compromise of sorts where one needs to know something about the expected abnormality
| expensive; thus, limited to small regions; sequencing is the gold standard but very costly; enzyme digestion and electrophoresis is a compromise of sorts where one needs to know something about the expected abnormality
|}
|}