Difference between revisions of "Libre Pathology:Verifiability"

Libre Pathology:Verifiability (view source)

283 bytes added , 04:58, 27 April 2016

48,470

edits

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 In [[Libre Pathology]], '''verifiability''' is held as essential. There is less emphasis on "who" and more emphasis on "what proves it".  As proponents of evidence based medicine, we want to see the evidence.
-Sources should be reliable.
+Sources should be reliable. How to create references is described in ''[[Libre Pathology:References]]''.
+Controversial areas of pathology should be considered from a [[LP:NPOV|neutral point of view]].
 ==Open access sources==
@@ Line 10: / Line 12: @@
 ==Personal experience==
-Personal experience is '''not''' considered a reliable source.  If you know something from experience, someone has probably written about it.  Go find the reference!  If it isn't written about, [[Libre Pathology]] is not the place to do so, as it is policy that there should be [[Libre Pathology:No original research|no original research]].
+Personal experience is '''not''' considered a reliable source.  If you know something from experience, someone has probably written about it.  Go find the reference!
+If it isn't written about, [[Libre Pathology]] is not the place to do so, as it is policy that there should be [[Libre Pathology:No original research|no original research]].
 ==See also==
 *[[Libre Pathology:Be bold]].
 *[[Libre Pathology:No original research]].
+*[[Libre Pathology:References]].
+*[[Libre Pathology:Neutral point of view]].
+*[[Libre Pathology:Editing]].
 [[Category:Libre Pathology policy]]