Difference between revisions of "Invisible colonic dysplasia"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Sign out: +alternate
(→‎Sign out: +alternate)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 37: Line 37:


Comment:
Comment:
If the tissue was NOT a polyp on endoscopy, close follow-up, a re-examination of the history/family history and re-biopsies (with terminal ileum) is suggested.
If the tissue was NOT a polyp on endoscopy, close follow-up, a re-examination of the history/family history and re-biopsies are suggested.
</pre>
 
===Alternate===
<pre>
Rectum, Biopsy:
    - Polypoid fragment of rectal mucosa with LOW-GRADE DYSPLASIA, see comment.
    - NEGATIVE for high-grade dysplasia and NEGATIVE for malignancy.
 
Comment:
The histomorphology would be in keeping with a tubular adenoma; however, this specimen was not submitted as a polyp. Clinical correlation is recommended. Close follow-up with re-biopsy is suggested.
</pre>
</pre>


48,470

edits

Navigation menu