Difference between revisions of "Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Microscopic: Put in ioffe scoring system
(→‎Microscopic: Put in ioffe scoring system)
 
Line 58: Line 58:
#*Normal gland spacing - lack of complexity ("lobular pattern").  
#*Normal gland spacing - lack of complexity ("lobular pattern").  
#*Normal gland depth (subjective).
#*Normal gland depth (subjective).
Ioffe, et al, :<ref name=pmid12657929>{{cite journal |author=Ioffe OB, Sagae S, Moritani S, Dahmoush L, Chen TT, Silverberg SG. |title=Proposal of a new scoring scheme for the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions |journal=Am J Surg Pathol | volume=27 | issue=4| pages=452–460 | year=2003 | pmid=12657929 |pmc= |doi= |url= }}</ref> devised a reproducible schema by which one might discern reactive glandular atypia, glandular dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ, summarized in the table below from the article:
Sum the scores for stratification, nuclear atypia, and mitoses/apoptotic bodies<br>
<br>
Stratification<br>
None (0 points)<br>
Mild (1 point)<br>
Moderate (2 points)<br>
Up to the luminal surface (3 points)<br>
<br>
Nuclear atypia<br>
As normal (0 points)<br>
Small (size of normal) or slightly enlarged uniform nuclei, minimal hyperchromasia, little dispolarity, no nucleoli (1 point)<br>
Nuclear enlargement (≤3× normal), moderate anisocytosis/hyperchromasia/dispolarity, occasional small nucleoli (2 points)<br>
Large nuclei (>3× normal), marked anisocytosis, marked hyperchromasia, severe dispolarity, frequent prominent nucleoli (3 points)<br>
<br>
Mitoses and apoptoses in two most active glands, number per gland (average between two glands)<br>
None (0 points)<br>
Less than 0.5 per gland (1 point)<br>
0.6–3.0 per gland (2 points)<br>
>3.0 per gland (3 points)<br>
<br>
Total score 0–3 = benign 4–5 = endocervical glandular dysplasia (EGD) 6–9 = adenocarcinoma in situ


DDx:
DDx:
Account-creators
179

edits

Navigation menu