48,877
edits
Difference between revisions of "Electrodesiccation and curettage"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Electrodesiccation and curettage (view source)
Revision as of 16:17, 13 February 2016
, 16:17, 13 February 2016no edit summary
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==General== | ==General== | ||
*EDC is typically done by family physicians and dermatologists for non-melanoma skin cancers.<ref name=pmid12170889>{{Cite journal | last1 = Goldman | first1 = G. | title = The current status of curettage and electrodesiccation. | journal = Dermatol Clin | volume = 20 | issue = 3 | pages = 569-78, ix | month = Jul | year = 2002 | doi = | PMID = 12170889 }}</ref> | *EDC is typically done by family physicians and dermatologists for non-[[melanoma]] skin cancers.<ref name=pmid12170889>{{Cite journal | last1 = Goldman | first1 = G. | title = The current status of curettage and electrodesiccation. | journal = Dermatol Clin | volume = 20 | issue = 3 | pages = 569-78, ix | month = Jul | year = 2002 | doi = | PMID = 12170889 }}</ref> | ||
*The practise is not without controversy.<ref name=pmid12170889/><ref name=pmid20677531>{{Cite journal | last1 = Reschly | first1 = MJ. | last2 = Shenefelt | first2 = PD. | title = Controversies in skin surgery: electrodessication and curettage versus excision for low-risk, small, well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas. | journal = J Drugs Dermatol | volume = 9 | issue = 7 | pages = 773-6 | month = Jul | year = 2010 | doi = | PMID = 20677531 }}</ref> | *The practise is not without controversy.<ref name=pmid12170889/><ref name=pmid20677531>{{Cite journal | last1 = Reschly | first1 = MJ. | last2 = Shenefelt | first2 = PD. | title = Controversies in skin surgery: electrodessication and curettage versus excision for low-risk, small, well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas. | journal = J Drugs Dermatol | volume = 9 | issue = 7 | pages = 773-6 | month = Jul | year = 2010 | doi = | PMID = 20677531 }}</ref> | ||