Difference between revisions of "Talk:Colon"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
428 bytes added ,  13:16, 19 December 2011
Line 52: Line 52:
====Comment====
====Comment====
The biopsies show features of chronicity and would be consistent with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a drug reaction, and chronic infection.  There are no eosinophilic abscesses, as previously noted (see report for specimen S11-3965) and severe inflammation with ulceration.  These findings make an eosinophilic enterocolitis unlikely.  In the context of an IBD diagnosis, histologic features would favour ulcerative colitis over Crohn's disease.
The biopsies show features of chronicity and would be consistent with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a drug reaction, and chronic infection.  There are no eosinophilic abscesses, as previously noted (see report for specimen S11-3965) and severe inflammation with ulceration.  These findings make an eosinophilic enterocolitis unlikely.  In the context of an IBD diagnosis, histologic features would favour ulcerative colitis over Crohn's disease.
== Lymphocytic colitis ==
===Final diagnosis===
Rectosigmoid, biopsy:
- Consistent with lymphocytic colitis, see comment.
===Comment===
The biopsy shows abundant intraepithelial lymphocytes with a preserved crypt architecture.  No thick subepithelial band of collagen is present. No granulomas are identified. The main histomorphologic differential diagnoses include resolving infection and early inflammatory bowel disease.
48,830

edits

Navigation menu