Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prostate cancer grading"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Gleason pattern 3 represents 15% of the cancer, and Gleason pattern 4 represents 85% of the cancer. The Gleason pattern 4 is concentrated in a nodule at the apex; the overall grade is based on this (separate) nodule. | Gleason pattern 3 represents 15% of the cancer, and Gleason pattern 4 represents 85% of the cancer. The Gleason pattern 4 is concentrated in a nodule at the apex; the overall grade is based on this (separate) nodule. | ||
Is grading of the index (dominant) nodule in prostate cancer of greater prognostic significance than global grading? | |||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.08.005 | |||
Index grade group is superior to composite grade group for prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy | |||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2022.10.012 | |||
== Poorly formed glands - Gleason 4 == | == Poorly formed glands - Gleason 4 == | ||
Latest revision as of 17:49, 15 August 2024
Separate nodule upgrading
Comment: The World Health Organization (WHO) grade (group) is: 4 out of 5.
Gleason pattern 3 represents 15% of the cancer, and Gleason pattern 4 represents 85% of the cancer. The Gleason pattern 4 is concentrated in a nodule at the apex; the overall grade is based on this (separate) nodule.
Is grading of the index (dominant) nodule in prostate cancer of greater prognostic significance than global grading?
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.08.005
Index grade group is superior to composite grade group for prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2022.10.012
Poorly formed glands - Gleason 4
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26099009