Difference between revisions of "Libre Pathology:Neutral point of view"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(create) |
(tweak... need policy on notable) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Libre Pathology]] strives to present a '''neutral point of view''' (abbreviated '''NPOV''') in areas of [[pathology]] with differing perspectives that are supported by [[LP:RS|credible published evidence]]. | [[Libre Pathology]] strives to present a '''neutral point of view''' (abbreviated '''NPOV''') in areas of [[pathology]] with differing perspectives that are supported by [[LP:RS|credible published evidence]]. | ||
The pathology literature frequently has competing systems for grading, [[cancer staging]] and classifying pathological changes. NPOV means that competing systems should ''not'' be willfully ignored, but objectively compared and described, in relation to relevant treatment issues and an understanding of their pathogenesis. | The pathology literature frequently has competing systems for grading, [[cancer staging]] and classifying pathological changes. NPOV means that notable competing systems should ''not'' be willfully ignored, but objectively compared and described, in relation to relevant treatment issues and an understanding of their pathogenesis. | ||
==Origins== | ==Origins== | ||
Latest revision as of 03:59, 24 July 2015
- LP:NPOV redirect here
Libre Pathology strives to present a neutral point of view (abbreviated NPOV) in areas of pathology with differing perspectives that are supported by credible published evidence.
The pathology literature frequently has competing systems for grading, cancer staging and classifying pathological changes. NPOV means that notable competing systems should not be willfully ignored, but objectively compared and described, in relation to relevant treatment issues and an understanding of their pathogenesis.
Origins
The policy in Libre Pathology is loosely based on Wikipedia's policy of the same name.