Difference between revisions of "Libre Pathology:No original research"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Libre Pathology]] should have '''no original research'''. The goal of the project is to deliver a distillation of the evidence that is out there. We try to find the best evidence. | [[Libre Pathology]] should have '''no original research'''. The goal of the project is to deliver a distillation of the evidence that is out there. We try to find the best evidence. | ||
It is a secondary source. It is a review. It is a guideline | It is a secondary source. It is a review. It is a guideline of sorts. | ||
It is '''not''' a place to float unproven ideas. If you have a novel idea, the place is a peer reviewed pathology journal. Many good pathology journals are out there already. | It is '''not''' a place to float unproven ideas. If you have a novel idea, the place is a peer reviewed pathology journal. Many good pathology journals are out there already. | ||
Latest revision as of 05:34, 12 April 2015
- LP:NOR redirects here
Libre Pathology should have no original research. The goal of the project is to deliver a distillation of the evidence that is out there. We try to find the best evidence.
It is a secondary source. It is a review. It is a guideline of sorts.
It is not a place to float unproven ideas. If you have a novel idea, the place is a peer reviewed pathology journal. Many good pathology journals are out there already.