Difference between revisions of "Endometrium"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Atrophic endometrium: tweak) |
m (t) |
||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
Notes: | Notes: | ||
* † McCluggage says one shouldn't call ''PPE'' without mitoses, as some pseudostratification can be seen in [[atrophic endometrium]].<ref name=pmid16873562>{{Cite journal | last1 = McCluggage | first1 = WG. | title = My approach to the interpretation of endometrial biopsies and curettings. | journal = J Clin Pathol | volume = 59 | issue = 8 | pages = 801-12 | month = Aug | year = 2006 | doi = 10.1136/jcp.2005.029702 | PMID = 16873562 }}</ref> | * † McCluggage says one shouldn't call ''PPE'' without mitoses, as some pseudostratification can be seen in [[atrophic endometrium]].<ref name=pmid16873562>{{Cite journal | last1 = McCluggage | first1 = WG. | title = My approach to the interpretation of endometrial biopsies and curettings. | journal = J Clin Pathol | volume = 59 | issue = 8 | pages = 801-12 | month = Aug | year = 2006 | doi = 10.1136/jcp.2005.029702 | PMID = 16873562 | PMC = 1860448 }}</ref> | ||
** There is no guidance on how hard one should look. VL suggests searching ~ 10 mm^2 with the 20x objective. This represents approximately ~ 10 fields of view with a microscope that has a 22 mm eye piece. | ** There is no guidance on how hard one should look. VL suggests searching ~ 10 mm^2 with the 20x objective. This represents approximately ~ 10 fields of view with a microscope that has a 22 mm eye piece. | ||
* Significant negatives: | * Significant negatives: | ||