Difference between revisions of "Libre Pathology:Verifiability"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "In Libre Pathology, '''verifiability''' is held as essential. There is less emphasis on "who" and more emphasis on "evidence". Sources should be reliable. Online open acc...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[Libre Pathology]], '''verifiability''' is held as essential. There is less emphasis on "who" and more emphasis on "evidence". | In [[Libre Pathology]], '''verifiability''' is held as essential. There is less emphasis on "who" and more emphasis on "evidence". | ||
Sources should be reliable. | Sources should be reliable. | ||
==Open access== | |||
Open access sources are preferred, as they allow immediate verification of information. | |||
==Personal experience== | |||
Personal experience is '''not''' considered a reliable source. If you know something from experience, someone has probably written about it. Go find the reference! If it isn't written about, [[Libre Pathology]] is not the place to do so, as it is policy that there should be [[Libre Pathology:No original research|no original research]]. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[LP:BOLD]]. | *[[LP:BOLD]]. | ||
*[[LP:NOR]]. | |||
[[Category:Libre Pathology policy]] | [[Category:Libre Pathology policy]] | ||
Revision as of 05:16, 12 April 2015
In Libre Pathology, verifiability is held as essential. There is less emphasis on "who" and more emphasis on "evidence".
Sources should be reliable.
Open access
Open access sources are preferred, as they allow immediate verification of information.
Personal experience
Personal experience is not considered a reliable source. If you know something from experience, someone has probably written about it. Go find the reference! If it isn't written about, Libre Pathology is not the place to do so, as it is policy that there should be no original research.