Difference between revisions of "Pathology books"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
781 bytes added ,  04:02, 1 February 2011
more
m (fix)
(more)
Line 4: Line 4:
This the standard reference for pathology residents.  It covers the bread & butter.
This the standard reference for pathology residents.  It covers the bread & butter.


Pros:
===Pros===
*It is the standard work... everyone refers to it.  You can't go wrong quoting Robbins.
*It is the standard work... everyone refers to it.  You can't go wrong quoting Robbins.


Cons:
===Cons===
*Very wordy. Not particularly practical --when you're sitting in from of the [[microscope]].
*Very wordy. Not particularly practical --when you're sitting in from of the [[microscope]].


References:
===Reference===
*{{Ref_PBoD}}
{{Ref_PBoD}}{{Ref_PBoD8}}
*{{Ref_PBoD8}}
 
==Practice of Surgical Pathology==
Probably the best book for beginners.  It covers basic things many others ignore, but are essential.
 
===Reference===
{{Ref TPoSP}}
 
==Diagnostic Criteria Handbook in Histopathology==
A relatively short, point-form book that covers most of pathology.
 
===Pros===
It covers most things.
 
===Cons===
*The abbreviations are annoying.
 
===Reference===
{{Ref DCHH}}
 
==Manual of Surgical Pathology (Lester)==
A reference for grossing.  It covers pretty much everything.  The first edition had great tables summarizing [[IHC]].
 
===Reference===
{{Ref Lester}}
 
==Washington manual of surgical pathology==
This is one of my favourite books and not very expensive.  It is to the point.  Missing are nice images.
 
===Reference===
{{Ref WMSP}}


==Pathology recall==
==Pathology recall==
48,589

edits

Navigation menu