Talk:Prostate cancer grading: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Michael (talk | contribs)
Michael (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


Gleason pattern 3 represents 15% of the cancer, and Gleason pattern 4 represents 85% of the cancer. The Gleason pattern 4 is concentrated in a nodule at the apex; the overall grade is based on this (separate) nodule.
Gleason pattern 3 represents 15% of the cancer, and Gleason pattern 4 represents 85% of the cancer. The Gleason pattern 4 is concentrated in a nodule at the apex; the overall grade is based on this (separate) nodule.
Is grading of the index (dominant) nodule in prostate cancer of greater prognostic significance than global grading?
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.08.005
Index grade group is superior to composite grade group for prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2022.10.012


== Poorly formed glands - Gleason 4 ==
== Poorly formed glands - Gleason 4 ==


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26099009
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26099009
== Update ==
*ISUP https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31279442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382533/
*GUPS https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32589068/