Diagnostic size cutoffs: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Michael (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Michael (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Lung carcinoid tumourlet - low mag.jpg|thumb|right|A [[carcinoid lung tumourlet]]; if it were larger it would be a [[carcinoid lung tumour]]. [[H&E stain]].]]
[[Image:Lung carcinoid tumourlet - low mag.jpg|thumb|right|A [[carcinoid tumourlet]]; if it were larger it would be a [[carcinoid lung tumour]]. [[H&E stain]].]]
'''Diagnostic size cutoffs''' are cutoffs which (in part) define a [[diagnosis]] and are seen in a number of places in [[pathology]].  They are usually somewhat arbitrary by their nature; however, they often make sense from a biologic big picture/management perspective.  It doesn't make sense to treat [[ADH]] and low-grade [[DCIS]] the same, as their behaviour is different.   
'''Diagnostic size cutoffs''' are cutoffs which (in part) define a [[diagnosis]] and are seen in a number of places in [[pathology]].  They are usually somewhat arbitrary by their nature; however, they often make sense from a biologic big picture/management perspective.  It doesn't make sense to treat [[ADH]] and low-grade [[DCIS]] the same, as their behaviour is different.   


==Rationale==
In [[pathology]], size matters.  With other things equal, in the context of how tumours are currently evaluated, big tumours usually do worse than small tumours.
In [[pathology]], size matters.  With other things equal, in the context of how tumours are currently evaluated, big tumours usually do worse than small tumours.


==A table of diagnostic size cutoffs==
{| class="wikitable sortable"  
{| class="wikitable sortable"  
!Smaller lesion (precursor)
!Smaller lesion (precursor)