Difference between revisions of "Libre Pathology:No original research"

From Libre Pathology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''LP:NOR redirects here''
:''LP:NOR redirects here''
Libre Pathology should have '''no original research'''.  The goal of the project is to deliver a distillation of the evidence that is out there.  We try to find the best evidence.  
[[Libre Pathology]] should have '''no original research'''.  The goal of the project is to deliver a distillation of the evidence that is out there.  We try to find the best evidence.  


It is a secondary source.  It is a review.  It is a guideline or sorts.   
It is a secondary source.  It is a review.  It is a guideline of sorts.   


It is '''not''' a place to float unproven ideas.  If you have a novel idea, the place is a peer reviewed pathology journal.  Many good pathology journals are out there already.
It is '''not''' a place to float unproven ideas.  If you have a novel idea, the place is a peer reviewed pathology journal.  Many good pathology journals are out there already.

Latest revision as of 05:34, 12 April 2015

LP:NOR redirects here

Libre Pathology should have no original research. The goal of the project is to deliver a distillation of the evidence that is out there. We try to find the best evidence.

It is a secondary source. It is a review. It is a guideline of sorts.

It is not a place to float unproven ideas. If you have a novel idea, the place is a peer reviewed pathology journal. Many good pathology journals are out there already.

See also