Difference between revisions of "Malignant mesothelioma"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,000 bytes added ,  19:53, 18 December 2024
no edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
| LMDDx      = mesothelial hyperplasia, [[fibrosing pleuritis]], [[adenocarcinoma]] - esp. [[lung adenocarcinoma|lung]], [[serous carcinoma]]
| LMDDx      = mesothelial hyperplasia, [[fibrosing pleuritis]], [[adenocarcinoma]] - esp. [[lung adenocarcinoma|lung]], [[serous carcinoma]]
| Stains    =  
| Stains    =  
| IHC        = calretinin +ve, D2-40 +ve, [[CK5/6]] +ve, WT-1 +ve, [[CK7]] +ve, CEA -ve, [[TTF-1]] -ve
| IHC        = calretinin +ve, D2-40 +ve, [[CK5/6]] +ve, WT-1 +ve, [[CK7]] +ve, CEA -ve, [[TTF-1]] -ve, MTAP -ve (pleural mesothelioma), BAP1 -ve
| EM        =
| EM        =
| Molecular  = +/-p16 deletion
| Molecular  = +/-p16 deletion
Line 123: Line 123:
*EMA +ve ~100% (vs. ~10%).  
*EMA +ve ~100% (vs. ~10%).  
*Desmin -ve ~5% (vs. ~85%).
*Desmin -ve ~5% (vs. ~85%).
*GLUT1 +ve ~50% (vs. ~10%)
*GLUT1 +ve ~50% (vs. ~10%).
*p53 +ve ~50% (vs. ~2%).
*p53 +ve ~50% (vs. ~2%).
*BAP1 -ve<ref name=pmid29085180>{{cite journal |authors=Pulford E, Huilgol K, Moffat D, Henderson DW, Klebe S |title=Malignant Mesothelioma, BAP1 Immunohistochemistry, and VEGFA: Does BAP1 Have Potential for Early Diagnosis and Assessment of Prognosis? |journal=Dis Markers |volume=2017 |issue= |pages=1310478 |date=2017 |pmid=29085180 |pmc=5612603 |doi=10.1155/2017/1310478 |url=}}</ref> ~57%.<ref name=pmid26226841>{{cite journal |authors=Andrici J, Sheen A, Sioson L, Wardell K, Clarkson A, Watson N, Ahadi MS, Farzin M, Toon CW, Gill AJ |title=Loss of expression of BAP1 is a useful adjunct, which strongly supports the diagnosis of mesothelioma in effusion cytology |journal=Mod Pathol |volume=28 |issue=10 |pages=1360–8 |date=October 2015 |pmid=26226841 |pmc=4761613 |doi=10.1038/modpathol.2015.87 |url=}}</ref>


Note:
Note:
*The above are ''not'' very useful in individual cases.
*The above are ''not'' very useful in individual cases.
*A simple pankeratin is useful for seening where epithelial cells are.
*A simple pankeratin is useful for seening where epithelial cells are.
Others:
*MTAP -ve.<ref name=pmid34465883>{{cite journal |authors=Dacic S |title=Pleural mesothelioma classification-update and challenges |journal=Mod Pathol |volume=35 |issue=Suppl 1 |pages=51–56 |date=January 2022 |pmid=34465883 |doi=10.1038/s41379-021-00895-7 |url=}}</ref>
**May not be sensitive and specific for peritoneal mesothelioma.{{fact}}


===Mesothelioma versus adenocarcinoma===
===Mesothelioma versus adenocarcinoma===
Line 140: Line 145:
**D2-40.
**D2-40.
**[[CK5/6]].
**[[CK5/6]].
**[[CA-125]].<ref name=pmid9023557>{{cite journal |authors=Bateman AC, al-Talib RK, Newman T, Williams JH, Herbert A |title=Immunohistochemical phenotype of malignant mesothelioma: predictive value of CA125 and HBME-1 expression |journal=Histopathology |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=49–56 |date=January 1997 |pmid=9023557 |doi=10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-562.x |url=}}</ref>
*Carcinoma markers:
*Carcinoma markers:
**CEA (monoclonal and polyclonal).
**CEA (monoclonal and polyclonal).
**[[TTF-1]].
**[[TTF-1]].
**[[Ber-EP4]].
**[[Ber-EP4]].
***100% of lung adenocarcinoma versus ~25% of mesotheliomas.<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Ordóñez NG |title=Value of the Ber-EP4 antibody in differentiating epithelial pleural mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma. The M.D. Anderson experience and a critical review of the literature |journal=Am J Clin Pathol |volume=109 |issue=1 |pages=85–9 |date=January 1998 |pmid= |doi=10.1093/ajcp/109.1.85 |url=}}</ref>
**MOC-31.
**MOC-31.
**CD15.
**CD15.
49,006

edits

Navigation menu