Difference between revisions of "Lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
+so
(+so)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Creating Lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy''' is assessed using a consensus protocol.<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Travis WD, Dacic S, Wistuba I, Sholl L, Adusumilli P, Bubendorf L, Bunn P, Cascone T, Chaft J, Chen G, Chou TY, Cooper W, Erasmus JJ, Ferreira CG, Goo JM, Heymach J, Hirsch FR, Horinouchi H, Kerr K, Kris M, Jain D, Kim YT, Lopez-Rios F, Lu S, Mitsudomi T, Moreira A, Motoi N, Nicholson AG, Oliveira R, Papotti M, Pastorino U, Paz-Ares L, Pelosi G, Poleri C, Provencio M, Roden AC, Scagliotti G, Swisher SG, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Vansteenkiste J, Weder W, Yatabe Y |title=IASLC Multidisciplinary Recommendations for Pathologic Assessment of Lung Cancer Resection Specimens After Neoadjuvant Therapy |journal=J Thorac Oncol |volume=15 |issue=5 |pages=709–740 |date=May 2020 |pmid=32004713 |pmc=8173999 |doi=10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.005 |url=}}</ref>
'''Creating Lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy''' is assessed using a consensus protocol.<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Travis WD, Dacic S, Wistuba I, Sholl L, Adusumilli P, Bubendorf L, Bunn P, Cascone T, Chaft J, Chen G, Chou TY, Cooper W, Erasmus JJ, Ferreira CG, Goo JM, Heymach J, Hirsch FR, Horinouchi H, Kerr K, Kris M, Jain D, Kim YT, Lopez-Rios F, Lu S, Mitsudomi T, Moreira A, Motoi N, Nicholson AG, Oliveira R, Papotti M, Pastorino U, Paz-Ares L, Pelosi G, Poleri C, Provencio M, Roden AC, Scagliotti G, Swisher SG, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Vansteenkiste J, Weder W, Yatabe Y |title=IASLC Multidisciplinary Recommendations for Pathologic Assessment of Lung Cancer Resection Specimens After Neoadjuvant Therapy |journal=J Thorac Oncol |volume=15 |issue=5 |pages=709–740 |date=May 2020 |pmid=32004713 |pmc=8173999 |doi=10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.005 |url=}}</ref>
==Sign out==
<pre>
At cut-up the tumour bed was estimated at 5.0 cm. The residual cancer's size is estimated as 1.5 cm (based on a linear measurement of the tumour on slide D15-D16). 
The estimated viable tumour was assessed in slides D14-D17 and was determined to be: 30%. The estimated viable tumour exceeds the cut-off (<=10%) for "Major Pathologic Response".[1] 
1. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 May;15(5):709-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.005
</pre>
===At cut-off value for Major Pathology Response===
<pre>
The estimated viable tumour was assessed in slides C10-C13 and was determined to be: 10%. The estimated viable tumour is at the cut-off (<=10%) for 'Major Pathologic Response'.[1]  Additional sections of the tumour bed are negative; thus, a 'Major Pathologic Response' is favoured.
1. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 May;15(5):709-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.005
</pre>


==See also==
==See also==
48,833

edits

Navigation menu