Difference between revisions of "Electrodesiccation and curettage"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Electrodesiccation and curettage''', abbreviated '''EDC''' and '''E+C''', is a procedure in which:
'''Electrodesiccation and curettage''', abbreviated '''EDC''' and '''E+C''', is a procedure in which:
# The lesion is cut-off.
# The lesion is cut-off (sent to pathology).
# The surgical site is cauterized using electricity (electrodesiccation).
# The surgical site is cauterized using electricity (electrodesiccation).
# The electrodesiccated tissue is scrapped off (curettage).  
# The electrodesiccated tissue is scrapped off (curettage).  


==General==
==General==
*EDC is typically done by family physicians and dermatologists for non-melanoma skin cancers.<ref name=pmid12170889>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Goldman | first1 = G. | title = The current status of curettage and electrodesiccation. | journal = Dermatol Clin | volume = 20 | issue = 3 | pages = 569-78, ix | month = Jul | year = 2002 | doi =  | PMID = 12170889 }}</ref>
*EDCs are typically done by family physicians and dermatologists for non-[[melanoma]] skin cancers.<ref name=pmid12170889>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Goldman | first1 = G. | title = The current status of curettage and electrodesiccation. | journal = Dermatol Clin | volume = 20 | issue = 3 | pages = 569-78, ix | month = Jul | year = 2002 | doi =  | PMID = 12170889 }}</ref>
*The practise is not without controversy.<ref name=pmid12170889/><ref name=pmid20677531>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Reschly | first1 = MJ. | last2 = Shenefelt | first2 = PD. | title = Controversies in skin surgery: electrodessication and curettage versus excision for low-risk, small, well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas. | journal = J Drugs Dermatol | volume = 9 | issue = 7 | pages = 773-6 | month = Jul | year = 2010 | doi =  | PMID = 20677531 }}</ref>  
*The practise is not without controversy.<ref name=pmid12170889/><ref name=pmid20677531>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Reschly | first1 = MJ. | last2 = Shenefelt | first2 = PD. | title = Controversies in skin surgery: electrodessication and curettage versus excision for low-risk, small, well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas. | journal = J Drugs Dermatol | volume = 9 | issue = 7 | pages = 773-6 | month = Jul | year = 2010 | doi =  | PMID = 20677531 }}</ref>  


Line 11: Line 11:
*The [[margin status]] is assessed clinically.
*The [[margin status]] is assessed clinically.
**The [[pathologist]] cannot comment on whether the margin is clear or the [[surgical clearance]].
**The [[pathologist]] cannot comment on whether the margin is clear or the [[surgical clearance]].
*Size of the lesion may be impossible to determine.
*The size of the lesion is usually impossible to determine on pathology.
 
==Sign out==
<pre>
Skin, Right Shoulder, Biopsy with Curettage and Electrodesiccation (CED):
- BASAL CELL CARCINOMA, margin status assessed clinically during CED.
</pre>
 
<pre>
Right Upper Lip, Biopsy with Curettage and Electrodesiccation (C+E):
- INVASIVE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA (well-differentiated), margin status assessed clinically during C+E.
</pre>
 
<pre>
Skin Lesion, Right Midline Back, Curettage and Electrodesiccation (C&E):
- BASAL CELL CARCINOMA, margin status assessed clinically during C&E.
</pre>


==References==
==References==
48,475

edits

Navigation menu