Difference between revisions of "Salivary glands"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3,378 bytes added ,  01:30, 12 January 2011
more
(more)
Line 122: Line 122:
| epithelioid
| epithelioid
| clear
| clear
| '''granular''', generous
| '''granular''' abundant
| stippled, +/-occ. nucleoli
| stippled, +/-occ. nucleoli
| ?
| ?
Line 360: Line 360:


=Malignant=
=Malignant=
Approach:
One approach:
*Differentiate -- luminal vs. myoepithelial vs. basal.
*Differentiate -- luminal vs. myoepithelial vs. basal (mucoepideroid).


==Mucoepidermoid carcinoma==
==Mucoepidermoid carcinoma==
*Abbreviated ''MEC''.
===General===
===General===
*Most common malignant neoplasm of salivary gland.
*Most common malignant neoplasm of salivary gland in all age groups.
*Female:male ~= 3:2.
*Site: parotid > submandibular.
 
===Gross===
*Cystic or solid, usu. a mix of both.


===Microscopic===
===Microscopic===
Features:
Features:
*Abundant fluffy cytoplasm - with large mucin vacuoles - '''key feature'''.
*Nucleus distorted by mucin vacuole.
*Architecture:<ref>URL: [http://moon.ouhsc.edu/kfung/jty1/opaq/PathQuiz/D2A001-PQ01-M.htm http://moon.ouhsc.edu/kfung/jty1/opaq/PathQuiz/D2A001-PQ01-M.htm]. Accessed on: 19 October 2010.</ref>
*Architecture:<ref>URL: [http://moon.ouhsc.edu/kfung/jty1/opaq/PathQuiz/D2A001-PQ01-M.htm http://moon.ouhsc.edu/kfung/jty1/opaq/PathQuiz/D2A001-PQ01-M.htm]. Accessed on: 19 October 2010.</ref>
**Cystic - low grade.
**Cystic (low grade).  
**Solid - high grade.
**Solid (high grade).
*Mucous cells with abundant fluffy cytoplasm and large mucin vacuoles - '''key feature'''.
**Nucleus distorted by mucin vacuole.
*Epidermoid cells:
**Non-keratinized, polygonal squamoid cell with clear or oncocytic cytoplasm.
***Clear cells contain glycogen ([[PAS]] +ve, [[PAS-D]] -ve).


Notes:
Notes:
*Mucin vacuoles may be rare; in a superficial glance -- it may mimic squamous cell carcinoma.
*Mucin vacuoles may be rare; in a superficial glance -- it may mimic squamous cell carcinoma.
*"Intermediate cells" are described in textbooks. Weinreb thinks they are a pretty much a myth.<ref>IW. 10 January 2011.</ref>
*The thought of high-grade MEC should prompt consideration of squamous cell carcinoma.


Images:
Images:
Line 382: Line 394:
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mucoepidermoid_carcinoma_%283%29_HE_stain.jpg Mucoepidermoid carcinoma 3 (WC)].
*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mucoepidermoid_carcinoma_%283%29_HE_stain.jpg Mucoepidermoid carcinoma 3 (WC)].
*[http://moon.ouhsc.edu/kfung/jty1/opaq/PathQuiz/D2A001-PQ01-M.htm Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (ouhsc.edu)].
*[http://moon.ouhsc.edu/kfung/jty1/opaq/PathQuiz/D2A001-PQ01-M.htm Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (ouhsc.edu)].
====Subtypes====
*Conventional.
*Oncocytic.
**Definition: composed of 50% oncocytes.
**Good outcome.<ref name=pmid18971778>{{cite journal |author=Weinreb I, Seethala RR, Perez-Ordoñez B, Chetty R, Hoschar AP, Hunt JL |title=Oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma: clinicopathologic description in a series of 12 cases |journal=Am. J. Surg. Pathol. |volume=33 |issue=3 |pages=409–16 |year=2009 |month=March |pmid=18971778 |doi=10.1097/PAS.0b013e318184b36d |url=}}</ref>
*Clear cell.
*Unicystic (cystadenocarcinoma).
**Based on the gross. (???)
*Sclerosing MEC +/- eosinophilia.
**Rare.
====Grading====
General:
*Two competing system exist:
**AFIP.<ref name=pmid9529011>{{cite journal |author=Goode RK, Auclair PL, Ellis GL |title=Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands: clinical and histopathologic analysis of 234 cases with evaluation of grading criteria |journal=Cancer |volume=82 |issue=7 |pages=1217–24 |year=1998 |month=April |pmid=9529011 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
**Brandwein.<ref name=pmid11420454>{{cite journal |author=Brandwein MS, Ivanov K, Wallace DI, ''et al.'' |title=Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 80 patients with special reference to histological grading |journal=Am. J. Surg. Pathol. |volume=25 |issue=7 |pages=835–45 |year=2001 |month=July |pmid=11420454 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
Notes:
*Both systems have their pros and cons.
*Weinreb uses the AFIP system with a slight modification.
=====AFIP=====
#Low cystic content <20%) - 2 points.
#Perineural invasion - 2 points.
#Necrosis - 3 points.
#Mitoses > 4 per 10 HPFs (HPF not defined in paper - see [[HPFitis]]) - 3 points.
#Anaplasia - 4 points.
Scoring:
*Low grade: 0-4 points.
*Intermediate grade: 5 or 6 points.
*High grade: 7+ points.
===Stains===
Mucous cells:
*Alcian blue +ve.
*Mucicarcmine +ve.


==Acinic cell adenocarcinoma==
==Acinic cell adenocarcinoma==
Line 390: Line 440:
*The relative prevalence of the neoplasm in the various salivary gland reflects the abundance of acinic cells: parotid gland (~80%) > minor salivary glands (~17%) > submandibular glands (~3%).
*The relative prevalence of the neoplasm in the various salivary gland reflects the abundance of acinic cells: parotid gland (~80%) > minor salivary glands (~17%) > submandibular glands (~3%).
*Affects wide age range -- including children.
*Affects wide age range -- including children.
 
*Site affect prognosis (most aggressive to least aggressive): submandibular > parotid > minor salivary.
===Gross===
===Gross===
*Tan or reddish.
*Tan or reddish.
Line 396: Line 446:
===Microscopic===
===Microscopic===
Features:
Features:
*Sheets of cells.
*Sheets of acinic cells with:
*Abundant cytoplasm.
**Abundant cytoplasm.
*Stippled chromatin.
**Small nuclei stippled chromatin.
*Scattered intercalcated duct type cells with:
**Eosinophilic cytoplasm with moderate amount of cytoplasm.
**Bland nuclei with slightly larger than seen in acinic cells.
*+/-Peri-tumoural lymphocytes.
*+/-Peri-tumoural lymphocytes.


Notes:
Notes:
*Adipose tissue -- present in the salivary glands -- is absent in AcCC.
*Adipose tissue -- present in the salivary glands -- is absent in AcCC.
*May focally resemble thyroid tissue.
*Smaller (characteristic) microvacuoles (unreported in the literature) may be present that have a bubbly appearance and glassy basophilic inclusions.<ref>IW. 11 January 2011.</ref>


Memory device:  
Memory device:  
Line 411: Line 466:
*[http://www.brown.edu/Courses/Digital_Path/systemic_path/hn/acinic.html AcCC (brown.edu)].
*[http://www.brown.edu/Courses/Digital_Path/systemic_path/hn/acinic.html AcCC (brown.edu)].
*[http://www.aciniccell.org/acc_images14.html AcCC (aciniccell.org)] - image collection.
*[http://www.aciniccell.org/acc_images14.html AcCC (aciniccell.org)] - image collection.
====Grading====
General:
*Not prognostic.
*Done to avoid phone calls from clinician.
Factors Weinreb uses:<ref>IW. 11 January 2011.</ref>
*Necrosis.
*Nuclear atypia.
*Perineural invasion.
*Mitoses.
*Infiltrative margin.
*Tumour sclerosis.


====Subtypes====
====Subtypes====
*Oncocytic variant.
*Oncocytic variant - rare.
*Clear cell variant.
*Clear cell variant - rare.
*Papillary cystic variant.
*Papillary cystic variant.


Line 420: Line 488:
*PAS +ve.
*PAS +ve.
*PAS-D +ve.
*PAS-D +ve.
*S-100 -ve.
*p63 -ve.
**p63 +ve in mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
There are a bunch of other stains that are touted to be useful (amylase, anti-chymotrypsin, lactoferrin); Weinreb thinks they are not helpful.<ref>IW. 11 January 2011.</ref>


==Adenoid cystic carcinoma==
==Adenoid cystic carcinoma==
48,536

edits

Navigation menu