Difference between revisions of "Radical prostatectomy"

From Libre Pathology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This article deals with how to cut-up a '''radical prostatectomy''', abbreviated '''RP'''. ==Introduction== RPs are done for prostate cancer. ==Protocol== Specimen: *Wei...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 22:30, 27 July 2014

This article deals with how to cut-up a radical prostatectomy, abbreviated RP.

Introduction

RPs are done for prostate cancer.

Protocol

Specimen:

  • Weight of specimen: ___ grams.
  • Prostate dimensions (superior-inferior, left-to-right, anterior-posterior): ___ x ___ x ___ cm.
  • Seminal vesicles:
    • Left (superior-inferior (long axis), , left-to-right, anterior-posterior): ___ cm.
    • Right (superior-inferior (long axis), , left-to-right, anterior-posterior): ___ cm.
  • Inking scheme: left - blue; right - green.


Protocol notes

Procedural

  • Amputate seminal vesicles (SV) after inking.
  • Sections of the SV base should be cut perpendicular the (long) axis of the gland.

Literature

There are several consensus papers on grossing prostatectomies by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP).

  • Prostate gland:[1]
    • Embedding in toto is not required.
      • A study by Epstein suggests it is reasonable to submit all of the posterior aspect and selected sections from the mid portion.[2]
    • The prostate should be painted -- to mark the margins.
    • Sectioning should be done after fixation.
    • The prostate should be weighted after trimming the seminal vesicles.
    • The apex of the prostate and the bladder neck should be sliced-off, sagittally sectioned, and submitted separately on edge (to assess the margin).
  • Lymph nodes and seminal vesicles (SV):[3]
    • All lymph nodes should be submitted.
      • Metastases are found in over 5% of tissue not grossly recognized as a lymph node;[4] thus, it makes sense to submit all tissue.[5]
    • The base of the SV/prostate junction must be submitted.

Alternate approaches

See also

Related protocols

References

  1. Samaratunga, H.; Montironi, R.; True, L.; Epstein, JI.; Griffiths, DF.; Humphrey, PA.; van der Kwast, T.; Wheeler, TM. et al. (Jan 2011). "International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.". Mod Pathol 24 (1): 6-15. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.178. PMID 20834234.
  2. Sehdev, AE.; Pan, CC.; Epstein, JI. (May 2001). "Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma.". Hum Pathol 32 (5): 494-9. doi:10.1053/hupa.2001.24322. PMID 11381367.
  3. Berney, DM.; Wheeler, TM.; Grignon, DJ.; Epstein, JI.; Griffiths, DF.; Humphrey, PA.; van der Kwast, T.; Montironi, R. et al. (Jan 2011). "International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes.". Mod Pathol 24 (1): 39-47. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.160. PMID 20818343.
  4. Epstein, JI.; Oesterling, JE.; Eggleston, JC.; Walsh, PC. (Dec 1986). "Frozen section detection of lymph node metastases in prostatic carcinoma: accuracy in grossly uninvolved pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.". J Urol 136 (6): 1234-7. PMID 3773097.
  5. Sung, MT.; davidson, DD.; Montironi, R.; Lopez-Beltran, L.; Cheng (2007). "Radical prostatectomy specimen processing: a critical appraisal of sampling methods.". Current Diagnostic Pathology 13: 490-498.