Difference between revisions of "Rapid on-site evaluation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Rapid on-site evaluation''', abbreviation '''ROSE''', is an immediate assessment of a tissue specimen. | '''Rapid on-site evaluation''', abbreviation '''ROSE''', is an immediate assessment of a tissue specimen. It is also known as '''immediate cytologic evaluation''' (abbreviated '''ICE''').<ref name=pmid9258733>{{Cite journal | last1 = Padhani | first1 = AR. | last2 = Scott | first2 = WW. | last3 = Cheema | first3 = M. | last4 = Kearney | first4 = D. | last5 = Erozan | first5 = YS. | title = The value of immediate cytologic evaluation for needle aspiration lung biopsy. | journal = Invest Radiol | volume = 32 | issue = 8 | pages = 453-8 | month = Aug | year = 1997 | doi = | PMID = 9258733 }}</ref> | ||
It can be used for [[staging]] [[lung cancer]].<ref name=pmid23244484>{{Cite journal | last1 = Yasufuku | first1 = K. | last2 = Fleury Feith | first2 = J. | title = Cytological specimens obtained by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: sample handling and role of rapid on-site evaluation. | journal = Ann Pathol | volume = 32 | issue = 6 | pages = e35-46, 421-32 | month = Dec | year = 2012 | doi = 10.1016/j.annpat.2012.09.212 | PMID = 23244484 }}</ref> | It can be used for [[staging]] [[lung cancer]].<ref name=pmid23244484>{{Cite journal | last1 = Yasufuku | first1 = K. | last2 = Fleury Feith | first2 = J. | title = Cytological specimens obtained by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: sample handling and role of rapid on-site evaluation. | journal = Ann Pathol | volume = 32 | issue = 6 | pages = e35-46, 421-32 | month = Dec | year = 2012 | doi = 10.1016/j.annpat.2012.09.212 | PMID = 23244484 }}</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:30, 25 April 2014
Rapid on-site evaluation, abbreviation ROSE, is an immediate assessment of a tissue specimen. It is also known as immediate cytologic evaluation (abbreviated ICE).[1]
It can be used for staging lung cancer.[2]
As the feedback is immediate, inadequate biopsies are reduced and repeat biopsies largely avoided.[3]
See also
References
- ↑ Padhani, AR.; Scott, WW.; Cheema, M.; Kearney, D.; Erozan, YS. (Aug 1997). "The value of immediate cytologic evaluation for needle aspiration lung biopsy.". Invest Radiol 32 (8): 453-8. PMID 9258733.
- ↑ Yasufuku, K.; Fleury Feith, J. (Dec 2012). "Cytological specimens obtained by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: sample handling and role of rapid on-site evaluation.". Ann Pathol 32 (6): e35-46, 421-32. doi:10.1016/j.annpat.2012.09.212. PMID 23244484.
- ↑ Collins, BT.; Murad, FM.; Wang, JF.; Bernadt, CT. (Sep 2013). "Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures.". Cancer Cytopathol 121 (9): 518-24. doi:10.1002/cncy.21340. PMID 23983161.