Difference between revisions of "Talk:Colon"
(→Lymphocytic colitis: new section) |
(→Isolated crypt abscess: new section) |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
===Comment=== | ===Comment=== | ||
The biopsy shows abundant intraepithelial lymphocytes with a preserved crypt architecture. No thick subepithelial band of collagen is present. No granulomas are identified. The main histomorphologic differential diagnoses include resolving infection and early inflammatory bowel disease. | The biopsy shows abundant intraepithelial lymphocytes with a preserved crypt architecture. No thick subepithelial band of collagen is present. No granulomas are identified. The main histomorphologic differential diagnoses include resolving infection and early inflammatory bowel disease. | ||
== Isolated crypt abscess == | |||
<pre> | |||
COLON, BIOPSY: | |||
- ONE ISOLATED CRYPT ABSCESS, ON THE BACKGROUND OF COLONIC MUCOSA WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT | |||
PATHOLOGY, SEE COMMENT. | |||
- NEGATIVE FOR LYMPHOCYTIC COLITIS AND NEGATIVE FOR COLLAGENOUS COLITIS. | |||
- NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA. | |||
COMMENT: | |||
The significance of the crypt abscess is unknown, as the background colon is not | |||
significantly inflamed. A definite cryptitis elsewhere is not identified. Architectural | |||
changes are not apparent. Clinical correlation is suggested. | |||
</pre> |
Revision as of 20:22, 12 November 2013
- See also: Talk:Gastrointestinal tract polyps.
Normal 1
Microscopic description
A. The sections show normal small bowel mucosa with a benign lymphoid nodule.
B-G. The sections show normal colonic-type mucosa.
Final diagnosis
A-G. Terminal ileum, cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum; biopsies (7x) - no pathologic diagnosis.
Normal 2
Microscopic description
A. The sections show normal small bowel mucosa with a benign lymphoid nodule.
B-G. The sections show normal colonic-type mucosa.
Final diagnosis
A. Terminal ileum, biopsy - no pathologic diagnosis.
B. Cecum, biopsy - no pathologic diagnosis.
C. Ascending colon, biopsy - no pathologic diagnosis.
D. Transverse colon, biopsy - no pathologic diagnosis.
E. Descending colon, biopsy - no pathologic diagnosis.
F. Sigmoid colon, biopsy - no pathologic diagnosis.
G. Rectum, biopsy - no pathologic diagnosis.
Rectal prolapse
Microscopic
The section shows benign fibromuscular hyperplasia of the lamina propria and submucosa. There is a mucosal erosion with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia characterized by germinal center formation. The germinal centers contain tingible-body macrophages.
Final diagnosis
A. Rectal polyp, biopsy - Benign fibromuscular hyperplasia and mucosal lymphoid hyperplasia with mucosal erosion.
Colitis
Microscopic
A. The sections show normal small bowel mucosa.
B. The sections show colonic-type mucosa with a mild lymphoplasmic inflammatory infiltrate and mild eosinophilia. There is no cryptitis and no crypt abscesses are identified. There is no architectural distortion. No granulomas are identified.
C. The sections show normal colonic-type mucosa.
D. The sections show colonic-type mucosa with a mild lymphoplasmic inflammatory infiltrate, mild eosinophilia and cryptitis. No crypt abscesses are identified. There is no architectural distortion. No granulomas are identified.
E. The sections show colonic-type mucosa with a mild lymphoplasmic inflammatory infiltrate, mild eosinophilia and cryptitis. Mild architectural distortion is present. No crypt abscesses are identified. No granulomas are identified.
F. The sections show granulation tissue and scant reactive colonic-type mucosa with abundant inflammatory cells, including, plasma cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils. Cryptitis, crypt destruction and crypt abscesses are present. No granulomas are identified. No dysplasia is identified.
G. The sections show colonic-type mucosa with a mild lymphoplasmic inflammatory infiltrate, mild eosinophilia and cryptitis. Mild-to-moderate architectural distortion is present. No crypt abscesses are identified. No granulomas are identified.
H. The sections show colonic-type mucosa with a mild lymphoplasmic inflammatory infiltrate, and mild eosinophilia. Mild-to-moderate architectural distortion is present. Many intraepithelial lymphocytes are present. No definite cryptitis is identified. No crypt abscesses are identified. No granulomas are identified.
Final diagnosis
A. Terminal ileum, biopsy - no pathology.
B. Cecum, biopsy - mild chronic colitis with mild eosinophilia.
C. Ascending colon, biopsy - no pathology.
D. Transverse colon, biopsy - mild focal active colitis with mild eosinophilia.
E. Descending colon, biopsy - mild active colitis with architectural changes.
F. Descending colon ("area of ulceration"), biopsy - severe active colitis with ulceration.
G. Sigmoid colon, biopsy - mild active colitis with architectural distortion.
H. Rectum, biopsy - mild chronic proctitis with possible mild acute proctitis.
Comment
The biopsies show features of chronicity and would be consistent with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a drug reaction, and chronic infection. There are no eosinophilic abscesses, as previously noted (see report for specimen S11-3965) and severe inflammation with ulceration. These findings make an eosinophilic enterocolitis unlikely. In the context of an IBD diagnosis, histologic features would favour ulcerative colitis over Crohn's disease.
Lymphocytic colitis
Final diagnosis
Rectosigmoid, biopsy: - Consistent with lymphocytic colitis, see comment.
Comment
The biopsy shows abundant intraepithelial lymphocytes with a preserved crypt architecture. No thick subepithelial band of collagen is present. No granulomas are identified. The main histomorphologic differential diagnoses include resolving infection and early inflammatory bowel disease.
Isolated crypt abscess
COLON, BIOPSY: - ONE ISOLATED CRYPT ABSCESS, ON THE BACKGROUND OF COLONIC MUCOSA WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT PATHOLOGY, SEE COMMENT. - NEGATIVE FOR LYMPHOCYTIC COLITIS AND NEGATIVE FOR COLLAGENOUS COLITIS. - NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA. COMMENT: The significance of the crypt abscess is unknown, as the background colon is not significantly inflamed. A definite cryptitis elsewhere is not identified. Architectural changes are not apparent. Clinical correlation is suggested.