Difference between revisions of "Informatics"

From Libre Pathology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(create)
 
m (tweak)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Informatics''' is the management of information.  Pathologists, unfortunately, only have abysmal tools for this job.   
'''Informatics''' is the management of information.   


The two main information system ''[[Softpath]]'' and ''[[CoPath]]'' are pathetic and look like they are out of the early 1990s.
Pathologists, unfortunately, only have abysmal tools for this job. 
 
The two main information systems (''[[Softpath]]'' and ''[[CoPath]]'') are pathetic and look like they are out of the early 1990s.


==Open source==
==Open source==
Open source in pathology appears to be a long way off.  One paper,<ref name=pmid15563662>{{cite journal |author=Rubin A |title=An open pathology computer system |journal=J. Clin. Pathol. |volume=57 |issue=12 |pages=1252–3 |year=2004 |month=December |pmid=15563662 |pmc=1770514 |doi=10.1136/jcp.2004.020826 |url=}}</ref> give me a bit of hope -- though I think this is a voice in the wilderness.   
Open source in pathology appears to be a long way off.  One paper,<ref name=pmid15563662>{{cite journal |author=Rubin A |title=An open pathology computer system |journal=J. Clin. Pathol. |volume=57 |issue=12 |pages=1252–3 |year=2004 |month=December |pmid=15563662 |pmc=1770514 |doi=10.1136/jcp.2004.020826 |url=}}</ref> gives me a bit of hope -- though I think this is a voice in the wilderness.   


IMHO, most pathologists understand very little about computers and those that think they know something often know very very little.
[[IMHO]], most pathologists understand very little about computers and those that think they know something often know precious little.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 17:45, 19 August 2010

Informatics is the management of information.

Pathologists, unfortunately, only have abysmal tools for this job.

The two main information systems (Softpath and CoPath) are pathetic and look like they are out of the early 1990s.

Open source

Open source in pathology appears to be a long way off. One paper,[1] gives me a bit of hope -- though I think this is a voice in the wilderness.

IMHO, most pathologists understand very little about computers and those that think they know something often know precious little.

References