Difference between revisions of "Informatics"

From Libre Pathology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+wikis section)
(+see also)
Line 3: Line 3:
Pathologists, unfortunately, only have abysmal tools for this job.   
Pathologists, unfortunately, only have abysmal tools for this job.   


The two main information systems (''[[Softpath]]'' and ''[[CoPath]]'') are pathetic and look like they are out of the early 1990s.
The two main clinical information systems (''[[Softpath]]'' and ''[[CoPath]]'') are pathetic and look like they are out of the early 1990s.


==Software in use at pathology departments==
==Software in use at pathology departments==
Line 19: Line 19:
{{Main|Pathology wikis}}
{{Main|Pathology wikis}}
*Wiki use for the dissemination of pathology knowledge is increasing.
*Wiki use for the dissemination of pathology knowledge is increasing.
*In the general sphere, Wikipedia is dominating a will probably continue to do so.<ref>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Heilman | first1 = JM. | last2 = Kemmann | first2 = E. | last3 = Bonert | first3 = M. | last4 = Chatterjee | first4 = A. | last5 = Ragar | first5 = B. | last6 = Beards | first6 = GM. | last7 = Iberri | first7 = DJ. | last8 = Harvey | first8 = M. | last9 = Thomas | first9 = B. | title = Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. | journal = J Med Internet Res | volume = 13 | issue = 1 | pages = e14 | month =  | year = 2011 | doi = 10.2196/jmir.1589 | PMID = 21282098 }}</ref>
*In the general sphere, Wikipedia is dominating a will probably continue to do so.<ref name=pmid21282098>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Heilman | first1 = JM. | last2 = Kemmann | first2 = E. | last3 = Bonert | first3 = M. | last4 = Chatterjee | first4 = A. | last5 = Ragar | first5 = B. | last6 = Beards | first6 = GM. | last7 = Iberri | first7 = DJ. | last8 = Harvey | first8 = M. | last9 = Thomas | first9 = B. | title = Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. | journal = J Med Internet Res | volume = 13 | issue = 1 | pages = e14 | month =  | year = 2011 | doi = 10.2196/jmir.1589 | PMID = 21282098 }}</ref>


==Open source==
==Open source==
Line 27: Line 27:


The radiologists are more on the ball here, e.g. [http://www.mii.ucla.edu/MainSite:OpenSourcePacsHome UCLA's OpenSourcePACS].<ref>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Bui | first1 = AA. | last2 = Morioka | first2 = C. | last3 = Dionisio | first3 = JD. | last4 = Johnson | first4 = DB. | last5 = Sinha | first5 = U. | last6 = Ardekani | first6 = S. | last7 = Taira | first7 = RK. | last8 = Aberle | first8 = DR. | last9 = El-Saden | first9 = S. | title = OpenSourcePACS: an extensible infrastructure for medical image management. | journal = IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed | volume = 11 | issue = 1 | pages = 94-109 | month = Jan | year = 2007 | doi =  | PMID = 17249408 }}</ref>
The radiologists are more on the ball here, e.g. [http://www.mii.ucla.edu/MainSite:OpenSourcePacsHome UCLA's OpenSourcePACS].<ref>{{Cite journal  | last1 = Bui | first1 = AA. | last2 = Morioka | first2 = C. | last3 = Dionisio | first3 = JD. | last4 = Johnson | first4 = DB. | last5 = Sinha | first5 = U. | last6 = Ardekani | first6 = S. | last7 = Taira | first7 = RK. | last8 = Aberle | first8 = DR. | last9 = El-Saden | first9 = S. | title = OpenSourcePACS: an extensible infrastructure for medical image management. | journal = IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed | volume = 11 | issue = 1 | pages = 94-109 | month = Jan | year = 2007 | doi =  | PMID = 17249408 }}</ref>
==See also==
*[[Quality]].


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 05:12, 13 December 2011

Informatics is the management of information.

Pathologists, unfortunately, only have abysmal tools for this job.

The two main clinical information systems (Softpath and CoPath) are pathetic and look like they are out of the early 1990s.

Software in use at pathology departments

Information systems

  • Softpath - a really crusty 'ol turd. It is hard to believe people buy licenses for this.
  • CoPath - pathetic software... considered state-of-the-art. It sucks less than Softpath.

Dictation

Database

Pathology wikis

  • Wiki use for the dissemination of pathology knowledge is increasing.
  • In the general sphere, Wikipedia is dominating a will probably continue to do so.[1]

Open source

Open source in pathology appears to be a long way off. One paper,[2] gives me a bit of hope -- though I think this is a voice in the wilderness.

IMHO, most pathologists understand very little about computers and those that think they know something often know precious little.

The radiologists are more on the ball here, e.g. UCLA's OpenSourcePACS.[3]

See also

References

  1. Heilman, JM.; Kemmann, E.; Bonert, M.; Chatterjee, A.; Ragar, B.; Beards, GM.; Iberri, DJ.; Harvey, M. et al. (2011). "Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion.". J Med Internet Res 13 (1): e14. doi:10.2196/jmir.1589. PMID 21282098.
  2. Rubin A (December 2004). "An open pathology computer system". J. Clin. Pathol. 57 (12): 1252–3. doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.020826. PMC 1770514. PMID 15563662. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1770514/.
  3. Bui, AA.; Morioka, C.; Dionisio, JD.; Johnson, DB.; Sinha, U.; Ardekani, S.; Taira, RK.; Aberle, DR. et al. (Jan 2007). "OpenSourcePACS: an extensible infrastructure for medical image management.". IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11 (1): 94-109. PMID 17249408.