HPFitis - Revision history

Michael: /* Consequences of HPFitis */

2021-11-26T14:52:15Z

Consequences of HPFitis

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 26 November 2021
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>		*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>
	*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.		*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.
	*Mitotic score in the Nottingham score for [[invasive breast cancer]] is based on the pseudo-standard area of "10 HPFs"; this results in significant variance due to the field area of the microscope in large cohorts.<ref name=pmid28202066>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Bonert \| first1 = M. \| last2 = Tate \| first2 = AJ. \| title = Mitotic counts in breast cancer should be standardized with a uniform sample area. \| journal = Biomed Eng Online \| volume = 16 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 28 \| month = Feb \| year = 2017 \| doi = 10.1186/s12938-016-0301-z \| PMID = 28202066 }}</ref>		*Mitotic score in the Nottingham score for [[invasive breast cancer]] is based on the pseudo-standard area of "10 HPFs"; this results in significant variance due to the field area of the microscope in large cohorts.<ref name=pmid28202066>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Bonert \| first1 = M. \| last2 = Tate \| first2 = AJ. \| title = Mitotic counts in breast cancer should be standardized with a uniform sample area. \| journal = Biomed Eng Online \| volume = 16 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 28 \| month = Feb \| year = 2017 \| doi = 10.1186/s12938-016-0301-z \| pmc = 5312435 \| PMID = 28202066 }}</ref>

	===Field area===		===Field area===

Michael: /* Consequences of HPFitis */

2018-01-16T22:05:37Z

Consequences of HPFitis

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 16 January 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>		*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>
	*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.		*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.
	*Mitotic score in the Nottingham score for [[invasive breast cancer]] is based on the pseudo-standard area of "10 HPFs".		*Mitotic score in the Nottingham score for [[invasive breast cancer]] is based on the pseudo-standard area of "10 HPFs"; this results in significant variance due to the field area of the microscope in large cohorts.<ref name=pmid28202066>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Bonert \| first1 = M. \| last2 = Tate \| first2 = AJ. \| title = Mitotic counts in breast cancer should be standardized with a uniform sample area. \| journal = Biomed Eng Online \| volume = 16 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 28 \| month = Feb \| year = 2017 \| doi = 10.1186/s12938-016-0301-z \| PMID = 28202066 }}</ref>

	===Field area===		===Field area===

Michael: /* Consequences of HPFitis */

2015-10-18T16:22:17Z

Consequences of HPFitis

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 18 October 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>		*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>
	*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.		*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.
	*Mitotic score in the Nottingham score for [[breast cancer]] is based on the pseudo-standard area of "10 HPFs".		*Mitotic score in the Nottingham score for [[invasive breast cancer]] is based on the pseudo-standard area of "10 HPFs".

	===Field area===		===Field area===

Michael: /* Consequences of HPFitis */

2015-10-18T16:21:59Z

Consequences of HPFitis

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 18 October 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>		*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>
	*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.		*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.
	*Nottingham ~~scoring in~~ [[breast cancer]] is based on the standard of "10 HPFs".		*Mitotic score in the Nottingham score for [[breast cancer]] is based on the pseudo-standard area of "10 HPFs".

	===Field area===		===Field area===

Michael at 04:08, 18 October 2015

2015-10-18T04:08:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 18 October 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:

	It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals.		It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals.

			===Consequences of HPFitis===
			*Papers on [[eosinophilic esophagitis]] are ''not'' comparable.<ref name=pmid17617209>{{cite journal \|author=Dellon ES, Aderoju A, Woosley JT, Sandler RS, Shaheen NJ \|title=Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review \|journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. \|volume=102 \|issue=10 \|pages=2300–13 \|year=2007 \|month=October \|pmid=17617209 \|doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01396.x \|url=}}</ref>
			*[[GIST]]s were improperly [[cancer staging\|staged]] - until they standardized to 5 mm<sup>2</sup>.
			*Nottingham scoring in [[breast cancer]] is based on the standard of "10 HPFs".

	===Field area===		===Field area===
Line 18:		Line 23:
	*[[IPFitis]] - a related uncommon disease.		*[[IPFitis]] - a related uncommon disease.
	*[[Basics]].		*[[Basics]].

			==References==
			{{Reflist\|1}}

	[[Category:Rants]]		[[Category:Rants]]

Michael at 17:53, 25 September 2015

2015-09-25T17:53:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 25 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''HPFitis''' is use of ''HPF'' (high-power field) without proper qualification, i.e. without giving the field area.		'''HPFitis''' is use of ''HPF'' (high-power field) without proper qualification, i.e. without giving the field area.

			''HPF'' redirects here.

			===Etiology===
	Its etiology is thought to be either:		Its etiology is thought to be either:
	#Ignorance of statistics and sampling theory.		#Ignorance of statistics and sampling theory.
Line 7:		Line 10:

	It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals.		It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals.

			===Field area===
			Most modern [[microscope]]s, have an eye piece diameter of 22 mm. Therefore, the field diameter at 40 X is approximately 22 mm / 40 X ~= 0.55 mm and the field of view is pi/4*(0.55 mm)<sup>2</sup> = 0.2376 mm<sup>2</sup>.

	==See also==		==See also==

Michael at 22:48, 1 January 2014

2014-01-01T22:48:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:48, 1 January 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	==See also==		==See also==
	*[[LPFitis]] - a related less common disease.		*[[LPFitis]] - a related less common disease.
			*[[IPFitis]] - a related uncommon disease.
	*[[Basics]].		*[[Basics]].

	[[Category:Rants]]		[[Category:Rants]]

Michael: link to LPFitis

2011-01-18T03:19:24Z

link to LPFitis

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 18 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''HPFitis''' is use of ''HPF'' (high-power field) without qualification.		'''HPFitis''' is use of ''HPF'' (high-power field) without proper qualification, i.e. without giving the field area.

	Its etiology is thought to be either:		Its etiology is thought to be either:
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==See also==		==See also==
			*[[LPFitis]] - a related less common disease.
	*[[Basics]].		*[[Basics]].

	[[Category:Rants]]		[[Category:Rants]]

Michael: link

2010-10-05T01:55:07Z

link

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 5 October 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals.		It appears to have a higher incidence in math phobic individuals.

			==See also==
			*[[Basics]].

	[[Category:Rants]]		[[Category:Rants]]

Michael: gr fix

2010-08-23T03:09:57Z

gr fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 23 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''HPFitis''' is use of ''HPF'' (high-power field) without qualification.		'''HPFitis''' is use of ''HPF'' (high-power field) without qualification.

	~~It's~~ etiology is thought to be either:		Its etiology is thought to be either:
	#Ignorance of statistics and sampling theory.		#Ignorance of statistics and sampling theory.
	#Laziness.		#Laziness.